ArticleIEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control2020
Source Density Apodization: Image Artifact Suppression Through Source Pitch Nonuniformity.
Article in IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Holographic diffusers for endoluminal-scale optical ultrasound imaging.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
- Non-iterative model-based inversion for low channel-count optical ultrasound imaginga).The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
- Towards clinical application of freehand optical ultrasound imaging.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Online evolution of a phased array for ultrasonic imaging by a novel adaptive data acquisition method.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conventional ultrasound imaging probes typically comprise finite-sized arrays of periodically spaced transducer elements which, in the case of phased arrays, can result in severe grating and sidelobe artifacts. Whereas side lobes can be effectively suppressed through amplitude apodization ("AmpA"), grating lobes arising from periodicity in transducer placement can only be suppressed by decreasing the element pitch, which is technologically challenging and costly. In this work, we present source density apodization ("SDA") as an alternative apodization scheme, where the spatial source density (and, hence, the element pitch) is varied across the imaging aperture. Using an all-optical ultrasound imaging setup capable of video-rate 2-D imaging as well as dynamic and arbitrary reconfiguration of the source array geometry, we show both numerically and experimentally how SDA and AmpA are equivalent for large numbers of sources. For low numbers of sources, SDA is shown to yield superior image quality as both side and grating lobes are effectively suppressed. In addition, we demonstrate how asymmetric SDA schemes can be used to locally and dynamically improve the image quality. Finally, we demonstrate how a nonsmoothly varying spatial source density (such as that obtained for randomized arrays or in the presence of source positioning uncertainty or inaccuracy) can yield severe image artifacts. The application of SDA can, thus, yield high image quality even for low channel counts, which can ultimately result in higher imaging frame rates using acquisition systems of reduced complexity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.