Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31603760›Full record

ArticleJournal of studies on alcohol and drugs2019

Adherence Across FDA-Approved Medications for Alcohol Use Disorder in a Veterans Administration Population.

James R Walker, Jeffrey E Korte, Aimee L McRae-Clark, Karen J Hartwell

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James R WalkerCarolina Center for Behavioral Health, Greer, South Carolina.
Jeffrey E KorteDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Aimee L McRae-ClarkDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Karen J HartwellDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Medical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

Drug Abuse Research Training (DART) ProgramR25DA020537 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI KATHLEEN T. BRADY, Sudie E Back · 2006 to 2026
$6.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA020537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveU.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medications exist for the treatment of alcohol use disorders. However, their effectiveness depends on proper adherence to the prescribed regimen. Differences in adherence across medications may have implications for clinical outcomes and may provide helpful information in considering treatment options. This study aims to identify significant differences in adherence if present.

methodA retrospective chart review was conducted in the Veterans Integrated Service Networks (VISN)-7 region of Veterans Affairs hospital and community-based outpatient clinics within South Carolina and Georgia. Prescriptions of FDA-approved alcohol use disorder medications from 2010 through 2015 were reviewed. Adherence was determined by the proportion of days the veteran had oral or injectable medication available over a 6-month period as noted by medication fills (reported as 0%-100% medication availability). We compared adherence for specific medications using chi-square, t test, logistic regression for dichotomous outcomes, and linear regression for continuous outcomes.

resultsA total of 715 subjects and 807 medication trials were included. Mean adherence (percentage of days that medication was available) was 41.3% for disulfiram, 44.7% for acamprosate, 49.8% for oral naltrexone, and 54.6% for extended-release injectable naltrexone. The mean adherence was significantly different between disulfiram and oral naltrexone (p = .002) as well as disulfiram and extended-release injectable naltrexone (p = .004). Adherence of 80% was achieved in 11.9%, 19.4%, 22.7%, and 24.4% of treatment courses with disulfiram, acamprosate, naltrexone, and extended-release injectable naltrexone, respectively. These differences were significant for disulfiram versus oral naltrexone (p = .004) and disulfiram versus extended-release injectable naltrexone (p = .05).

conclusionsThese results demonstrate that overall adherence to medication-assisted treatment for alcohol use disorder is low across all medications. When directly compared, disulfiram had significantly lower adherence than both oral and extended-release injectable naltrexone.

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceAcamprosateAlcohol DeterrentsAlcoholismDisulfiramFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNaltrexoneRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationVeteransAcamprosateAlcohol DeterrentsDisulfiramNaltrexone

Identifiers

PMID31603760
PMCPMC6811722
OpenAlexW2981001303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.