Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31603505›Full record

ArticlePathogens and disease2019

Cationic amphiphiles against Gardnerella vaginalis resistant strains and bacterial vaginosis-associated pathogens.

Richard M Weeks, Alysha Moretti, Shuang Song, Kathryn E Uhrich, Andrey V Karlyshev, Michael L Chikindas

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathogens and disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The Female Vaginal Microbiome in Health and Bacterial Vaginosis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard M WeeksHealth Promoting Naturals Laboratory, School of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Rutgers State University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
Alysha MorettiDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers State University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Shuang SongDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
Kathryn E UhrichDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers State University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Andrey V KarlyshevDepartment of Biomolecular Sciences, Kingston University, Kingston upon Thames KT1 1LQ, UK.
Michael L ChikindasHealth Promoting Naturals Laboratory, School of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Rutgers State University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USKingston University · GBUniversity of California, Riverside · US

Funding

Synthetic AMPs that Control Biofilms of Gram-variable PathogensR21AI126053 · NIAID · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI CHIKINDAS, MICHAEL, UHRICH, KATHRYN ELIZABETH · 2016 to 2017
$421k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI126053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance and infection recurrence are critical issues in treating bacterial vaginosis, the most common vaginal disorder in women of reproductive age. Novel alternatives to traditional antibiotics, such as peptidomimetics, have the potential to address this challenge. Previously, two series of cationic amphiphiles (CAms) were developed with both hydrophilic head groups and non-polar domains, giving them the ability to self-assemble into supramolecular nanostructures with membrane-lytic properties. Those CAms were shown to be effective against biofilms of Gardnerella vaginalis while preserving the commensal microbiota. Two new series of CAms were designed with varying levels of flexibility between the hydrophilic head groups and the hydrophobic domains. Activities against the vaginal pathogen G. vaginalis ranged from 1.3 to 18.5 µM, while the tested vaginal lactobacilli were significantly more tolerant of CAms, with minimal inhibitory concentration values as high as 208 µM. Minimal biofilm bactericidal concentrations of the tested CAms ranged from 21.47 to <388.3 µM, and were lowest against resistant forms of G. vaginalis, while Lactobacillus biofilms were tolerant of concentrations ≥687 µM. Safety aspects of the CAms were also investigated, and they were found to be safe for use against vaginal ectocervical tissue.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesBiofilmsCell SurvivalFemaleGardnerella vaginalisHumansLactobacillusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicrobial ViabilityModels, TheoreticalTreatment OutcomeVaginosis, BacterialAnti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesAMP mimicsantimicrobialsbacterial vaginosisbiofilmGardnerella vaginalis

Identifiers

PMID31603505
PMCPMC7076263
OpenAlexW2979660490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.