Observational studyJAMA network open2019
Association of Family Ratings of Quality of End-of-Life Care With Stopping Dialysis Treatment and Receipt of Hospice Services.
Observational study in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of a Novel Hospice-Specific Patient Decision Aid.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2024Trial
- Experiences of Family Caregivers of Older Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease from Dialysis Initiation to End-of-Life Care: An Exploratory Qualitative Descriptive Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Nephrologists' perspectives and experiences with hospice among older adults with end-stage kidney disease.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2024Article
- Concurrent Hospice and Dialysis Care: Considerations for Implementation.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Article
- When Patients Make Unexpected Medical Choices.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2023Article
- Association of Hospice Payer With Concurrent Receipt of Hospice and Dialysis Among US Veterans With End-stage Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Analysis of a National Cohort.JAMA health forum · 2022Article
- Description and Outcomes of an Innovative Concurrent Hospice-Dialysis Program.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2022Article
- Hospice care for end stage liver disease in the United States.Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2021Review
- Perceptions of Illness Severity, Treatment Goals, and Life Expectancy: The ePISTLE Study.Kidney international reports · 2021Article
- The Association Between Hospital End-of-Life Care Quality and the Care Received Among Patients With Heart Failure.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2021Article
- Thematic Analysis of Hospice Mentions in the Health Records of Veterans with Advanced Kidney Disease.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2020Article
- Stopping Dialysis, Good Deaths, and Social Justice.JAMA network open · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Approximately 1 in 4 patients receiving maintenance dialysis for end-stage renal disease eventually stop treatment before death. Little is known about the association of stopping dialysis and quality of end-of-life care. Objectives: To evaluate the association of stopping dialysis before death with family-rated quality of end-of-life care and whether this association differed according to receipt of hospice services at the time of death. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study included data from 3369 patients who were treated with maintenance dialysis at 111 Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers and died between October 1, 2009, to September 30, 2015. Data set construction and analyses were conducted from September 2017 to July 2019. Exposure: Cessation of dialysis treatment before death. Main Outcomes and Measures: Bereaved Family Survey ratings. Results: Among 3369 patients included, the mean (SD) age at death was 70.6 (10.2) years, and 3320 (98.5%) were male. Overall, 937 patients (27.8%) stopped dialysis before death and 2432 patients (72.2%) continued dialysis treatment until death. Patients who stopped dialysis were more likely to have been receiving hospice services at the time of death than patients who continued dialysis (544 patients [58.1%] vs 430 patients [17.7%]). Overall, 1701 patients (50.5%) had a family member who responded to the Bereaved Family Survey. In adjusted analyses, families were more likely to rate overall quality of end-of-life care as excellent if the patient had stopped dialysis (54.9% vs 45.9%; risk difference, 9.0% [95% CI, 3.3%-14.8%]; P = .002) or continued to receive dialysis but also received hospice services (60.5% vs 40.0%; risk difference, 20.5% [95% CI, 12.2%-28.9%]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: This survey study found that families rated overall quality of end-of-life care higher for patients who stopped dialysis before death or continued dialysis but received concurrent hospice services. More work to prepare patients for end-of-life decision-making and to expand access to hospice services may help to improve the quality of end-of-life care for patients with end-stage renal disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.