Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31603429›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2019

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Technology Intervention to Support Postabortion Care (The FACTS Study Phase II) After Surgical Abortion: User-Centered Design.

Roopan Kaur Gill, Gina Ogilvie, Wendy V Norman, Brian Fitzsimmons, Ciana Maher, Regina Renner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roopan Kaur GillWomen's Health Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6984-5800
Gina OgilvieWomen's Health Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5783-4493
Wendy V NormanWomen's Health Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4340-7882
Brian FitzsimmonsWomen's Health Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9824-465X
Ciana MaherWomen's Health Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3642-7554
Regina RennerWomen's Health Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0166-4381
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman-centered design is a methodology that applies an iterative participatory process that engages the end-user for whom an innovation or intervention is designed for from start to end. There is general evidence to support the use of human-centered design for development of tools to affect health behavior, but specifically for family planning provision. This study is part two of a three-phase study that uses a user-centered design methodology which uses the findings from Phase I to design, develop, and test a digital health solution to support follow-up after an induced surgical abortion.

objectiveThe objectives for this study were to: (1) develop a Web-based intervention based on preferences and experiences of women who underwent an abortion as measured in the formative phase of the Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mobile Technology Intervention to Support Postabortion Care Study; (2) conduct usability testing of the intervention to determine user-friendliness and appropriateness of the intervention; and (3) finalize a beta version of the Web-based intervention for pilot testing.

methodsThe study design was based on the "development-evaluation-implementation" process from the Medical Research Council Framework for Complex Medical Interventions. This study is in Phase II of III and is based on user-centered design methodology. Phase I findings demonstrated that women engage with technology to assist in clinical care and they preferred a comprehensive website with email or text notifications to support follow-up care. In Phase II we collaborated with family planning experts and key stakeholders to synthesize evidence from Phase I. With them and a development partner we built a prototype. Usability testing was completed with 9 participants using a validated System Usability Scale. This was then used to refine the intervention for Phase III pilot study. This study was approved by the local Ethics board.

resultsWe developed a comprehensive Web-based tool called myPostCare.ca, which includes: Post-Procedure Care, Emotional Well-Being Tool, Contraception Explorer, Sexual Health, Book an Appointment, and Other Resources. Additionally, over the course of a month after the procedure, automatic email notifications were sent to women as a form of virtual follow-up support, directing them to myPostCare.ca resources. The Web-based tool was refined based on usability testing results.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated that user-centered design is a useful methodology to build programs and interventions that are women-centered, specifically for abortion care.

Indexed as

abortiondigital healthhuman centered designknowledge translationmHealthsexual healthwomen's health

Identifiers

PMID31603429
PMCPMC6819013
OpenAlexW2970924419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.