ArticleBMJ open2019
Study protocol for a randomised double-blinded, sham-controlled, prospective, cross-over clinical trial of vagal neuromodulation for pain treatment in patients with chronic pancreatitis.
Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03357029 (Neuromodulation in Patients With Painful Chronic Pancreatitis - A Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled, Prospective, Cross-over, Controlled Study in Chronic Pain Investigating if a Novel Vagal Neuromodulation Approach Provides Analgesic Benefit Through Central Mechanisms in Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neuromodulation in Patients With Painful Chronic Pancreatitis - A Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled, Prospective, Cross-over, Controlled Study in Chronic Pain Investigating if a Novel Vagal Neuromodulation Approach Provides Analgesic Benefit Through Central Mechanisms in Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Postpartum Contraction Pain During Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Management of chronic pancreatitis: recent advances and future prospects.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2024Review
- The evolving obesity challenge: targeting the vagus nerve and the inflammatory reflex in the response.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2021Review
- Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation: From Concept to Application.Neuroscience bulletin · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe management of chronic pancreatitis (CP) is challenging and requires a personalised approach focused on the individual patient's main symptoms. Abdominal pain is the most prominent symptom in CP, where central pain mechanisms, including sensitisation and impaired pain modulation, often are involved. Recent clinical studies suggest that vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) induces analgesic effects through the modulation of central pain pathways. This study aims to investigate the effect of 2 weeks transcutaneous VNS (t-VNS) on clinical pain in patients with CP, in comparison to the effect of sham treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Twenty-one patients with CP will be enrolled in this randomised, double-blinded, single-centre, sham-controlled, cross-over study. The study has two treatment periods: A 2-week active t-VNS using GammaCore device and a 2-week treatment with a sham device. During both treatment periods, the patients are instructed to self-administer VNS bilaterally to the cervical vagal area, three times per day. Treatment periods will be separated by 2 weeks. During the study period, patients will record their daily pain experience in a diary (primary clinical endpoint). In addition, all subjects will undergo testing which will include MRI, quantitative sensory testing, cardiac vagal tone assessment and collecting blood samples, before and after the two treatments to investigate mechanisms underlying VNS effects. The data will be analysed using the principle of intention to treat. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The regional ethics committee has approved the study: N-20170023. Results of the trial will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03357029.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.