Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31603076›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Study protocol for a randomised double-blinded, sham-controlled, prospective, cross-over clinical trial of vagal neuromodulation for pain treatment in patients with chronic pancreatitis.

Janusiya Anajan Muthulingam, Søren Schou Olesen, Tine Maria Hansen, Christina Brock, Asbjørn Mohr Drewes, Jens Brøndum Frøkjær

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03357029 (Neuromodulation in Patients With Painful Chronic Pancreatitis - A Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled, Prospective, Cross-over, Controlled Study in Chronic Pain Investigating if a Novel Vagal Neuromodulation Approach Provides Analgesic Benefit Through Central Mechanisms in Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03357029 nacompletednot on this map

Neuromodulation in Patients With Painful Chronic Pancreatitis - A Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled, Prospective, Cross-over, Controlled Study in Chronic Pain Investigating if a Novel Vagal Neuromodulation Approach Provides Analgesic Benefit Through Central Mechanisms in Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorJens Brøndum FrøkjærRan2018 to 2019Enrolled28ConditionsPainful Chronic Pancreatitis, Visceral Pain, Neuropathic PainArmsGammaCore Device, Sham Device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Janusiya Anajan MuthulingamMech-Sense, Department of Radiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Søren Schou OlesenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Tine Maria HansenMech-Sense, Department of Radiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Christina BrockDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Asbjørn Mohr DrewesDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Jens Brøndum FrøkjærMech-Sense, Department of Radiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8722-0070
Aalborg University Hospital · DKAalborg University · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe management of chronic pancreatitis (CP) is challenging and requires a personalised approach focused on the individual patient's main symptoms. Abdominal pain is the most prominent symptom in CP, where central pain mechanisms, including sensitisation and impaired pain modulation, often are involved. Recent clinical studies suggest that vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) induces analgesic effects through the modulation of central pain pathways. This study aims to investigate the effect of 2 weeks transcutaneous VNS (t-VNS) on clinical pain in patients with CP, in comparison to the effect of sham treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Twenty-one patients with CP will be enrolled in this randomised, double-blinded, single-centre, sham-controlled, cross-over study. The study has two treatment periods: A 2-week active t-VNS using GammaCore device and a 2-week treatment with a sham device. During both treatment periods, the patients are instructed to self-administer VNS bilaterally to the cervical vagal area, three times per day. Treatment periods will be separated by 2 weeks. During the study period, patients will record their daily pain experience in a diary (primary clinical endpoint). In addition, all subjects will undergo testing which will include MRI, quantitative sensory testing, cardiac vagal tone assessment and collecting blood samples, before and after the two treatments to investigate mechanisms underlying VNS effects. The data will be analysed using the principle of intention to treat. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The regional ethics committee has approved the study: N-20170023. Results of the trial will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03357029.

Indexed as

Abdominal PainChronic PainCross-Over StudiesDenmarkHumansPain ManagementPain MeasurementPancreatitis, ChronicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTranscutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulationchronic painclinical trialsgastrointestinal diseasetranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulationviscera

Identifiers

PMID31603076
PMCPMC6720238
OpenAlexW2969413926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.