Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31602678›Full record

Observational studyJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2020

Development and verification of a discriminate algorithm for diagnosing post-neurosurgical bacterial meningitis-A multicenter observational study.

Guanghui Zheng, Xufeng Ji, Xiaochen Yu, Min Liu, Jing Huang, Lina Zhang, Dawen Guo, Guojun Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Guanghui ZhengDepartment of Clinical Diagnosis, Laboratory of Beijing Tiantan Hospital and Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xufeng JiDepartment of Clinical Diagnosis, Laboratory of the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Xiaochen YuLaboratory Diagnosis Department of the Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Min LiuDaqing Oilfield General Hospital Clinical Laboratory, Daqing, China.
Jing HuangDepartment of Clinical Diagnosis, Laboratory of the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Lina ZhangDaqing Oilfield General Hospital Clinical Laboratory, Daqing, China.
Dawen GuoLaboratory Diagnosis Department of the Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Guojun ZhangDepartment of Clinical Diagnosis, Laboratory of Beijing Tiantan Hospital and Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1370-6112
Capital Medical University · CNDaqing Oilfield General Hospital · CNHarbin Medical University · CNJilin University · CN

Funding

Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals QML20180502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-based routine clinical examinations for post-neurosurgical bacterial meningitis (PNBM) in multicenter post-neurosurgical patients.

methodsThe diagnostic accuracies of routine examinations to distinguish between PNBM and post-neurosurgical aseptic meningitis (PNAM) were evaluated by determining the values of the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve in a retrospective analysis of post-neurosurgical patients in four centers.

resultsAn algorithm was constructed using the logistic analysis as a classical method to maximize the capacity for differentiating the two classes by integrating the measurements of five variables. The AUC value of this algorithm was 0.907, which was significantly higher than those of individual routine blood/CSF examinations. The predicted value from 70 PNBM patients was greater than the cutoff value, and the diagnostic accuracy rate was 75.3%. The results of 181 patients with PNAM showed that 172 patients could be correctly identified with specificity of 95.3%, while the overall correctness rate of the algorithm was 88.6%.

conclusionsRoutine biomarkers such as CSF/blood glucose ratio (C/B-Glu), CSF lactate (C-Lac), CSF glucose concentration (C-Glu), CSF leukocyte count (C-Leu), and blood glucose concentration (B-Glu) can be used for auxiliary diagnosis of PNBM. The multicenter retrospective research revealed that the combination of the five abovementioned biomarkers can effectively improve the efficacy of the PNBM diagnosis.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumansMeningitis, BacterialMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeurosurgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsYoung AdultBiomarkersalgorithmcerebrospinal fluidPNBMreceiver operating characteristic

Identifiers

PMID31602678
PMCPMC7031544
OpenAlexW2979707967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.