ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020
Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: beyond the learning curve.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Is Transanal total mesorectal excision (TME) as safe and effective as laparoscopic TME for low rectal cancer? A propensity score-matched analysis.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Oncologic outcomes following transanal total mesorectal excision: the United States experience.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Observational
- Recurrence following transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a monocentric retrospective series of technically difficult cases.Annals of coloproctology · 2023Article
- Outcomes of open vs laparoscopic vs robotic vs transanal total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer: a network meta-analysis.Techniques in coloproctology · 2023Review
- Impact of the approach on conversion to open surgery during minimally invasive restorative total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.International journal of colorectal disease · 2023Article
- Article
- Evaluation of the learning curve for conformal sphincter preservation operation in the treatment of ultralow rectal cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- Transanal total mesorectal excision outcomes for advanced rectal cancer in a complex surgical population.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Transanal total mesorectal excision and transabdominal robotic surgery for rectal cancer: A retrospective study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021Article
- Robotic Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (RTaTME): State of the Art.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Review
- SP rTaTME: initial clinical experience with single-port robotic transanal total mesorectal excision (SP rTaTME).Techniques in coloproctology · 2021Article
- Locoregional recurrences after transanal total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer during implementation.The British journal of surgery · 2020Article
- The ACPGBI recommends pause for reflection on transanal total mesorectal excision.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTransanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) is a surgical approach for low rectal cancer with a learning curve estimated at 40-50 cases. The experience among taTME surgeons beyond their learning curve is limited.
methodsA retrospective analysis of all taTME cases performed for rectal cancer at two tertiary care hospitals from 2014 to 2019 was conducted. Transanal surgeons had previously performed > 50 taTME cases. Demographic, perioperative, and short-term outcomes were analyzed.
resultsAmong 54 taTME patients, 74.1% were male and 27.8% had a BMI ≥ 30. Tumors were stage I (8), II (13), III (29), and IV (4). Complex cases included 4 local recurrences, 4 prior liver resections, and 2 with prior prostate cancer. Thirty tumors were located ≤ 6 cm from the anal verge. On staging MRI, 12 had a positive predicted circumferential radial margin (+CRM), and 4 had internal anal sphincter involvement (+IAS). Forty-seven patients received neoadjuvant therapy. A 2-team approach was used in 51 patients with laparoscopic (83.3%) or robotic (16.7%) abdominal assistance with a 9.2% conversion rate. Low anterior resection with sphincter salvage was achieved in 87% with 8 patients requiring intersphincteric resection. Anastomoses were hand-sewn in 57.4% and all patients were diverted. Median LOS was 5 days with a 42.6% 30-day morbidity rate and 3 postoperative mortalities (ARDS, pulmonary embolism and pseudomembranous colitis). Complete and near complete TME grade was achieved in 94.4% with a 3.7% rate of +CRM. At a median follow-up of 28 months, local and distant recurrence rates were 3.9% and 17.6%, respectively, with no cancer-related mortality.
conclusionIndications for taTME at experienced centers have expanded to include complex reoperative cases, local recurrences, metastatic cancer, and tumors with threatened CRM or IAS with evidence of post-treatment tumor regression. In the latter cases, taTME achieves good short-term outcomes and may facilitate R0 resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31602515What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.