Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31602512›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2020

Automated multiparametric localization of prostate cancer based on B-mode, shear-wave elastography, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound radiomics.

Rogier R Wildeboer, Christophe K Mannaerts, Ruud J G van Sloun, Lars Budäus, Derya Tilki, Hessel Wijkstra, Georg Salomon, Massimo Mischi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Precision medicine in prostate cancer: individualized treatment through radiomics, genomics, and biomarkers.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rogier R WildeboerLab of Biomedical Diagnostics, Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, De Rondom 70, 5612 AP, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. r.r.wildeboer@tue.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1306-3663
Christophe K MannaertsDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ruud J G van SlounLab of Biomedical Diagnostics, Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, De Rondom 70, 5612 AP, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Lars BudäusMartini-Clinic - Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Derya TilkiMartini-Clinic - Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Hessel WijkstraLab of Biomedical Diagnostics, Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, De Rondom 70, 5612 AP, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Georg SalomonMartini-Clinic - Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Massimo MischiLab of Biomedical Diagnostics, Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, De Rondom 70, 5612 AP, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Funding

Dutch Cancer Society #UVA2013-5941Eindhoven University of Technology in collaboration with Philips IMPULS2-programEuropean Research Council Starting Grant #280209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to assess the potential of machine learning based on B-mode, shear-wave elastography (SWE), and dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) radiomics for the localization of prostate cancer (PCa) lesions using transrectal ultrasound.

methodsThis study was approved by the institutional review board and comprised 50 men with biopsy-confirmed PCa that were referred for radical prostatectomy. Prior to surgery, patients received transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), SWE, and DCE-US for three imaging planes. The images were automatically segmented and registered. First, model-based features related to contrast perfusion and dispersion were extracted from the DCE-US videos. Subsequently, radiomics were retrieved from all modalities. Machine learning was applied through a random forest classification algorithm, using the co-registered histopathology from the radical prostatectomy specimens as a reference to draw benign and malignant regions of interest. To avoid overfitting, the performance of the multiparametric classifier was assessed through leave-one-patient-out cross-validation.

resultsThe multiparametric classifier reached a region-wise area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.75 and 0.90 for PCa and Gleason > 3 + 4 significant PCa, respectively, thereby outperforming the best-performing single parameter (i.e., contrast velocity) yielding ROC-AUCs of 0.69 and 0.76, respectively. Machine learning revealed that combinations between perfusion-, dispersion-, and elasticity-related features were favored.

conclusionsIn this paper, technical feasibility of multiparametric machine learning to improve upon single US modalities for the localization of PCa has been demonstrated. Extended datasets for training and testing may establish the clinical value of automatic multiparametric US classification in the early diagnosis of PCa. KEY POINTS: • Combination of B-mode ultrasound, shear-wave elastography, and contrast ultrasound radiomics through machine learning is technically feasible. • Multiparametric ultrasound demonstrated a higher prostate cancer localization ability than single ultrasound modalities. • Computer-aided multiparametric ultrasound could help clinicians in biopsy targeting.

Indexed as

AgedAlgorithmsArea Under CurveContrast MediaElasticity Imaging TechniquesHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveUltrasonographyContrast MediaContrast mediaElasticity imaging techniquesMachine learningProstate cancerUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID31602512
PMCPMC6957554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.