Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31602435›Full record

ReviewArchives of academic emergency medicine2019

Outcomes of Crowding in Emergency Departments; a Systematic Review.

Hamid Reza Rasouli, Ali Aliakbar Esfahani, Mohammad Nobakht, Mohsen Eskandari, Sardollah Mahmoodi, Hassan Goodarzi, Mohsen Abbasi Farajzadeh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of academic emergency medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Assessment of Sydney Triage to Admission Risk Tool (START) on Egyptian Emergency Department performance.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Emergency Department Boarding, Crowding, and Error.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hamid Reza RasouliTrauma Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ali Aliakbar EsfahaniMarine Medicine Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad NobakhtMarine Medicine Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohsen EskandariMarine Medicine Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sardollah MahmoodiTrauma Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hassan GoodarziTrauma Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohsen Abbasi FarajzadehMarine Medicine Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEmergency Department (ED) crowding is a global public health phenomenon affecting access and quality of care. In this study, we seek to conduct a systematic review concerning the challenges and outcomes of ED crowding.

methodsThis systematic review utilized original research articles published from 1st January 2007, to 1st January 2019. Relevant articles from the PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, and Google scholar databases were extracted using predesigned keywords. Following the PRISMA guidelines, two reviewers independently evaluated the quality of the studies using Critical Appraisal Skills Programme for cohort studies and qualitative studies, and Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument for studies.

resultsOut of the total of 73 articles in the final record, we excluded 15 of them because of poor quality. This systematic review synthesized the reports of 58 original articles. The outcomes of multiple individual patients and healthcare-related challenges are comprehensively assessed.

conclusionsED crowding affects individual patients, healthcare systems and communities at large. The negative influences of crowding on healthcare service delivery result in delayed service delivery, poor quality care, and inefficiency; all negatively affecting the emergency patients' healthcare outcomes, in turn.

Indexed as

Crowdingemergency servicehospitaloutcome assessmentsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31602435
PMCPMC6785211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.