Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31602352›Full record

ArticleCureus2019

Defining the Indications and Levels of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Pediatric Patients: A Retrospective Study of Our Current Experience.

Can Aksu, Yavuz Gurkan

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07281235 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Perioperative Analgesia With Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block Versus Ultrasound Guided Caudal Block in Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlexandria UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsLocal Analgesia Via Infiltration, Caudal Epidural Anesthesia, Caudal Block, Caudal Block for Postoperative AnalgesiaArmsUltrasound Guided Bilateral single shot Erector Spinae Plane Block, Caudal Block Anesthesia
NCT07602179 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Analgesic Efficacy and Hemodynamic Stability of Ultrasound-guided Thoracic Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Pediatric Thoracic Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorNguyen Dang ThuRan2023 to 2025Enrolled70ConditionsPostoperative Pain, Thoracic Surgery Lung, Thoracotomy Analgesia, Regional AnesthesiaArmsThoracic erector spinae plane block (ESPB), Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Erector spinae plane block in children: a narrative review.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Can AksuAnesthesiology, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, TUR.
Yavuz GurkanAnesthesiology, Koç University, İstanbul, TUR.
Kocaeli Üniversitesi · TRKoç University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim  The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the indications, effectiveness, application levels, and local anesthetic (LA) dosages used in erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in pediatric patients
 based on our clinical data. The secondary aim was to compare previously reported pediatric ESPBs with our data and to prepare a mini-guide for future clinical applications. Materials and methods One hundred and forty-one pediatric patients who received ESPB and were operated by the Department of Pediatric Surgery were included in this retrospective observational study. ESPB is routinely performed with 0.5 ml/kg 0.25% bupivacaine (max 20 ml). Demographic data and the type of surgery were recorded. Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) or Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores, analgesic requirements, and the type of analgesic administered at postoperative period were recorded. Results ESPB was applied using three different techniques, the classic approach, the transverse approach, and the Aksu approach. Unilateral ESPB was performed on 112 patients, while 29 received a bilateral block. ESPB used for 13 different indications. Conclusion ESPB is a relatively safe and effective procedure for achieving opioid-free postoperative analgesia in many different surgical procedures in pediatric patients.

Indexed as

erector spinae plane blockpediatric anesthesiapostoperative analgesiapostoperative painultrasound

Identifiers

PMID31602352
PMCPMC6779152
OpenAlexW2968795163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.