ArticleCureus2019
Association of Ambulatory Ability on Complications and Medical Costs in Patients with Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Decision-analytic Model.
Article in Cureus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk and protective factors for emergency department visits and related hospitalizations among ambulatory adults with traumatic spinal cord injury.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2025Article
- Differences in personal characteristics and health outcomes between ambulatory and non-ambulatory adults with traumatic spinal cord injury.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose The objective of this study was to determine the independent association of ambulatory ability with complications and medical costs in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods Patients with SCI between T1-T12 enrolled in the National Spinal Cord Injury Database (NSCID) provided a minimum one-year follow-up. Covariate-adjusted annual rates of important medical complications (pressure sore, urinary tract infection, hospitalization) and associated medical costs were determined over five years post-injury. Results A total of 1,753 patients provided data at one-year follow-up and 1,340 patients provided five-year data. At one-year post-injury, 82% of patients were non-ambulatory and 18% were ambulatory. After adjusting for important covariates, ambulatory status was associated with a lower annual probability of urinary tract infection (43% vs. 68%), pressure sore (12% vs. 35%), and hospitalization (23% vs. 34%). Covariate-adjusted base-case medical costs due to urinary tract infection, pressure sore, and hospitalization were 34% lower in ambulatory vs. non-ambulatory patients ($31,358 vs. $47,266) over five years. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed the base-case results. Conclusion In spinal cord-injured individuals, the ability to ambulate is independently associated with lower complication risks and associated medical costs over the five-year period following injury. Long-term clinical benefit and cost savings may be realized with assisted or unassisted ambulation in spinal cord-injured patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.