ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2019
Application of a modified optical fiber in targeted percutaneous laser disc decompression of lumbar disc herniation: A retrospective study.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- PERCUTANEOUS LASER DISC DECOMPRESSION FOR LUMBAR RADICULAR PAIN: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF PUBMED IN THE LAST FIVE YEARS.Acta clinica Croatica · 2023Pooled it
- Outcomes of Percutaneous Laser Disc Decompression for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Spine surgery and related research · 2026Review
- The impact of intervertebral disc hydration on the photothermal responses and carbonization properties in low-energy laser therapy.Lasers in medical science · 2025Article
- MRI changes and clinical results of low energy semiconductor percutaneous laser disc decompression(LS-PLDD) for lumbar disc herniation in adolescents.Lasers in medical science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Targeted percutaneous laser disc decompression (T-PLDD) is a minimally invasive technique for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). However, the amount of energy required is large and the nerve can be easily damaged. Therefore, this technology requires improvement. The present study aimed to observe the effects of using a modified optical fiber (Mod) in T-PLDD for the treatment of LDH. A retrospective study was conducted using the database of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University (Qingdao, China). In total, 58 patients who received T-PLDD with the Mod between June 2011 and May 2012 were included in the present study. The 10-point numeric rating score, pain rating index and good-to-excellent rating at 3 months (1.64±0.97; 5.79±1.57; 94.8%) were lower than those at 1 week (5.12±1.37; 11.52±1.85; 74.2%), and at 1 month (3.26±1.41; 7.83±1.31; 82.8%; P<0.05) and were maintained for up to 36 months (1.48±0.86; 4.91±1.43; 96.5%). The Oswestry disability index and 12-item Short Form Health Survey at 6 months (24.56±6.78; 69.40±5.08) were improved compared with 1 week, 1 month and 3 months, and were maintained for 36 months (23.10±6.20; 70.89±5.39). The T2 value decreased at 1 week (76±8) and returned to normal at 3 months (152±11). Additionally, patients in the Young group (<50 years old) recovered in a shorter period of time than the patients in the Elderly group. In conclusion, the patients stayed in hospital for 3.34±0.66 days; pain decreased and function increased optimally at 3-6 months and was maintained for 36 months with no serious complications. Individuals <50 years old may be more suitable candidates for T-PLDD with the Mod. The Mod should be applied and promoted in T-PLDD, and its use should be considered in the clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.