ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2019
Lung Cancer Detection using Co-learning from Chest CT Images and Clinical Demographics.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving lung cancer diagnosis and survival prediction with deep learning and CT imaging.PloS one · 2025Article
- Accelerated muscle mass estimation from CT images through transfer learning.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- The impact of the lung EDRN-CVC on Phase 1, 2, & 3 biomarker validation studies.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2022Article
- Development and Characterization of a Chest CT Atlas.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2021Article
- Time-distanced gates in long short-term memory networks.Medical image analysis · 2020Article
- Deep Multi-task Prediction of Lung Cancer and Cancer-free Progression from Censored Heterogenous Clinical Imaging.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2020Article
- Deep learning applications in pulmonary medical imaging: recent updates and insights on COVID-19.Machine vision and applications · 2020Article
- Internal-transfer Weighting of Multi-task Learning for Lung Cancer Detection.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2020Article
- Detection and Independent Validation of Model-Based Quantitative Transcriptional Regulation Relationships Altered in Lung Cancers.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early detection of lung cancer is essential in reducing mortality. Recent studies have demonstrated the clinical utility of low-dose computed tomography (CT) to detect lung cancer among individuals selected based on very limited clinical information. However, this strategy yields high false positive rates, which can lead to unnecessary and potentially harmful procedures. To address such challenges, we established a pipeline that co-learns from detailed clinical demographics and 3D CT images. Toward this end, we leveraged data from the Consortium for Molecular and Cellular Characterization of Screen-Detected Lesions (MCL), which focuses on early detection of lung cancer. A 3D attention-based deep convolutional neural net (DCNN) is proposed to identify lung cancer from the chest CT scan without prior anatomical location of the suspicious nodule. To improve upon the non-invasive discrimination between benign and malignant, we applied a random forest classifier to a dataset integrating clinical information to imaging data. The results show that the AUC obtained from clinical demographics alone was 0.635 while the attention network alone reached an accuracy of 0.687. In contrast when applying our proposed pipeline integrating clinical and imaging variables, we reached an AUC of 0.787 on the testing dataset. The proposed network both efficiently captures anatomical information for classification and also generates attention maps that explain the features that drive performance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.