ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2019
Towards Machine Learning Prediction of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) Intra-operative Efficacy Maps.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deep learning in neurosurgery: a systematic literature review with a structured analysis of applications across subspecialties.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Deep Brain Stimulation: Mechanisms, Cost-Effectiveness, and Precision Applications Across Neurology and Psychiatry.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Magnetic resonance imaging image analysis of the therapeutic effect and neuroprotective effect of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease based on a deep learning algorithm.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2022Article
- Radiomic features of amygdala nuclei and hippocampus subfields help to predict subthalamic deep brain stimulation motor outcomes for Parkinson's disease patients.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Prediction of Deep Brain Stimulation Outcome in Parkinson's Disease With Connectome Based on Hemispheric Asymmetry.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Artificial intelligence for brain diseases: A systematic review.APL bioengineering · 2020Review
- Machine Learning's Application in Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: A Review.Brain sciences · 2020Review
- Connectome-Based Model Predicts Deep Brain Stimulation Outcome in Parkinson's Disease.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2020Article
- Deep Learning-Based Deep Brain Stimulation Targeting and Clinical Applications.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
- Deep brain stimulation in children with acquired dystonia.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has the potential to improve the quality of life of people with a variety of neurological diseases. A key challenge in DBS is in the placement of a stimulation electrode in the anatomical location that maximizes efficacy and minimizes side effects. Pre-operative localization of the optimal stimulation zone can reduce surgical times and morbidity. Current methods of producing efficacy probability maps follow an anatomical guidance on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to identify the areas with the highest efficacy in a population. In this work, we propose to revisit this problem as a classification problem, where each voxel in the MRI is a sample informed by the surrounding anatomy. We use a patch-based convolutional neural network to classify a stimulation coordinate as having a positive reduction in symptoms during surgery. We use a cohort of 187 patients with a total of 2,869 stimulation coordinates, upon which 3D patches were extracted and associated with an efficacy score. We compare our results with a registration-based method of surgical planning. We show an improvement in the classification of intraoperative stimulation coordinates as a positive response in reduction of symptoms with AUC of 0.670 compared to a baseline registration-based approach, which achieves an AUC of 0.627 (p < 0.01). Although additional validation is needed, the proposed classification framework and deep learning method appear well-suited for improving pre-surgical planning and personalize treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.