ArticleScientific reports2019
Somatic substitution signature as an innovative tool in lung cancer diagnosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unveiling diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets in lung adenocarcinoma using bioinformatics and experimental validation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Differential early diagnosis of benign versus malignant lung cancer using systematic pathway flux analysis of peripheral blood leukocytes.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- OncoSNIPE® Study Protocol, a study of molecular profiles associated with development of resistance in solid cancer patients.BMC cancer · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diagnosis of lung cancer can sometimes be challenging and is of major interest since effective molecular-guided therapies are available. Compounds of tobacco smoke may generate a specific substitutional signature in lung, which is the most exposed organ. To predict whether a tumor is of lung origin or not, we developed and validated the EASILUNG (Exome And SIgnature LUNG) test based on the relative frequencies of somatic substitutions on coding non-transcribed DNA strands from whole-exome sequenced tumors. Data from 7,796 frozen tumor samples (prior to any treatment) from 32 TCGA solid cancer groups were used for its development. External validation was carried out on a local dataset of 196 consecutive routine exome results. Eight out of the 12 classes of substitutions were required to compute the EASILUNG signature that demonstrated good calibration and good discriminative power with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 72% after recalibration on the external validation dataset. This innovative test may be helpful in medical decision-making in patients with unknown primary tumors potentially of lung origin and in the diagnosis of lung cancer in smokers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.