ArticleScientific reports2019
Distribution and quantification of bioluminescence as an ecological trait in the deep sea benthos.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Glow in the D-ARK: a new bioluminescent species ofRoyal Society open science · 2025Article
- A bioluminescent deep-sea polychaete within the genus Aricidea (Paraonidae) from Minamidaito Island, Japan.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Marine eukaryote bioluminescence: a review of species and their functional biology.Marine life science & technology · 2025Review
- Glowing wonders: exploring the diversity and ecological significance of bioluminescent organisms in Brazil.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2024Review
- Evolution of bioluminescence in Anthozoa with emphasis on Octocorallia.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Systematic Distribution of Bioluminescence in Marine Animals: A Species-Level Inventory.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
- Blue light promotes zero-valent sulfur production in a deep-sea bacterium.The EMBO journal · 2023Article
- Evidence foriScience · 2020Article
- Terrestrial and marine bioluminescent organisms from the Indian subcontinent: a review.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bioluminescence is a prominent functional trait used for visual communication. A recent quantification showed that in pelagic ecosystems more than 75% of individual macro-planktonic organisms are categorized as able to emit light. In benthic ecosystems, only a few censuses have been done, and were based on a limited number of observations. In this study, our dataset is based on observations from remotely operated vehicle (ROV) dives conducted from 1991-2016, spanning 0-3,972 m depth. Data were collected in the greater Monterey Bay area in central California, USA and include 369,326 pelagic and 154,275 epibenthic observations at Davidson Seamount, Guide Seamount, Sur Ridge and Monterey Bay. Because direct observation of in situ bioluminescence remains a technical challenge, taxa from ROV observations were categorized based on knowledge gained from the literature to assess bioluminescence status. We found that between 30-41% of the individual observed benthic organisms were categorized as capable of emitting light, with a strong difference between benthic and pelagic ecosystems. We conclude that overall variability in the distribution of bioluminescent organisms is related to the major differences between benthic and pelagic habitats in the deep ocean. This study may serve as the basis of future investigations linking the optical properties of various habitats and the variability of bioluminescent organism distributions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.