Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31601829›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Quantitative biparametric analysis of hybrid

Johannes Lohmeier, Georg Bohner, Eberhard Siebert, Winfried Brenner, Bernd Hamm, Marcus R Makowski

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Reducing acquisition time in O-(2-Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Contribution of [Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Synthetic PET via Domain Translation of 3-D MRI.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Fully automated analysis combining [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Johannes LohmeierCharité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Radiology, Campus Charité Mitte (CCM), Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. johannes.lohmeier@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8927-2453
Georg BohnerCharité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Neuroradiology, Campus Charité Mitte (CCM), Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Eberhard SiebertCharité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Neuroradiology, Campus Charité Mitte (CCM), Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Winfried BrennerCharité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Campus Virchow-Klinikum (CVK), Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Bernd HammCharité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Radiology, Campus Charité Mitte (CCM), Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Marcus R MakowskiCharité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Radiology, Campus Charité Mitte (CCM), Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the diagnostic potential of simultaneous

Indexed as

AdultArea Under CurveBrain NeoplasmsCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleGliomaHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeuroimagingPositron-Emission Tomography(18F)fluoroethyltyrosineTyrosine

Identifiers

PMID31601829
PMCPMC6787240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.