Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31601819›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Characterization of coral-associated microbial aggregates (CAMAs) within tissues of the coral Acropora hyacinthus.

Naohisa Wada, Mizuki Ishimochi, Taeko Matsui, F Joseph Pollock, Sen-Lin Tang, Tracy D Ainsworth, Bette L Willis, Nobuhiro Mano, David G Bourne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Naohisa WadaBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Nangang, 11529, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5949-9115
Mizuki IshimochiDepartment of Marine Science and Resources, College of Bioresource Science, Nihon University, Fujisawa, 252-0813, Kanagawa, Japan.
Taeko MatsuiDepartment of Marine Science and Resources, College of Bioresource Science, Nihon University, Fujisawa, 252-0813, Kanagawa, Japan.
F Joseph PollockThe Nature Conservancy, Caribbean Division, Coral Gables, FL, 33134, USA.
Sen-Lin TangBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Nangang, 11529, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5852-972X
Tracy D AinsworthSchool of Biological, Earth and Environmental Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, NSW, Australia.
Bette L WillisCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, 4811, QLD, Australia.
Nobuhiro ManoDepartment of Marine Science and Resources, College of Bioresource Science, Nihon University, Fujisawa, 252-0813, Kanagawa, Japan. mano.nobuhiro@nihon-u.ac.jp.
David G BourneCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, 4811, QLD, Australia. david.bourne@jcu.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial diversity associated with corals has been studied extensively, however, localization of bacterial associations within the holobiont is still poorly resolved. Here we provide novel insight into the localization of coral-associated microbial aggregates (CAMAs) within tissues of the coral Acropora hyacinthus. In total, 318 and 308 CAMAs were characterized via histological and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) approaches respectively, and shown to be distributed extensively throughout coral tissues collected from five sites in Japan and Australia. The densities of CAMAs within the tissues were negatively correlated with the distance from the coastline (i.e. lowest densities at offshore sites). CAMAs were randomly distributed across the six coral tissue regions investigated. Within each CAMA, bacterial cells had similar morphological characteristics, but bacterial morphologies varied among CAMAs, with at least five distinct types identified. Identifying the location of microorganisms associated with the coral host is a prerequisite for understanding their contributions to fitness. Localization of tissue-specific communities housed within CAMAs is particularly important, as these communities are potentially important contributors to vital metabolic functions of the holobiont.

Indexed as

SymbiosisAnimalsAnthozoaAustraliaBacteriaCoral ReefsDNA, BacterialIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceJapanMicrobiotaPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNADNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID31601819
PMCPMC6787259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.