Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31601587›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Process evaluation protocol for the I-WOTCH study: an opioid tapering support programme for people with chronic non-malignant pain.

Vivien P Nichols, Charles Abraham, Sam Eldabe, Harbinder K Sandhu, Martin Underwood, Kate Seers, I-WOTCH team

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vivien P NicholsWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK v.p.nichols@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3372-1395
Charles AbrahamFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, UK.
Sam EldabeDepartment of Pain Medicine, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Harbinder K SandhuWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Martin UnderwoodWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Kate SeersWarwick Research in Nursing, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
I-WOTCH team

Funding

Department of Health HTA/14/224/04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Improving the Wellbeing of people with Opioid Treated CHronic Pain (I-WOTCH) randomised controlled trial uses a multicomponent self-management intervention to help people taper their opioid use. This approach is not widely used and its efficacy is unknown. A process evaluation alongside the trial will help to assess how the intervention was delivered, looking at the dose of intervention received and the fidelity of the delivery. We will explore how the intervention may have brought about change through the experiences of the participants receiving and the staff delivering the intervention and whether there were contextual factors involved. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A mixed methods process evaluation will assess how the processes of the I-WOTCH intervention fared and whether these affected the outcomes. We will collect quantitative data, for example, group attendance analysed with statistical methods. Qualitative data, for example, from interviews and feedback forms will be analysed using framework analysis. We will use a 'following a thread' and a mixed methods matrix for the final integrated analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The I-WOTCH trial and process evaluation were granted full ethics approval by Yorkshire and The Humber-South Yorkshire Research Ethics Committee on 13 September 2016 (16/YH/0325). All data were collected in accordance with data protection guidelines. Participants provided written informed consent for the main trial, and all interviewees provided additional written informed consent. The results of the process evaluation will be published and presented at conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN49470934; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidChronic PainFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMalePain ManagementRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelf-ManagementTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics, Opioidchronic non-malignant painopioidsprocess evaluationprotocoltapering

Identifiers

PMID31601587
PMCPMC6797361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.