Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31601272›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics & chromatin2019

MeCP2-E1 isoform is a dynamically expressed, weakly DNA-bound protein with different protein and DNA interactions compared to MeCP2-E2.

Alexia Martínez de Paz, Leila Khajavi, Hélène Martin, Rafael Claveria-Gimeno, Susanne Tom Dieck, Manjinder S Cheema, Jose V Sanchez-Mut, Malgorzata M Moksa, Annaick Carles, Nick I Brodie and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics & chromatin, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Modulating alternative splicing ofScience translational medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. SRSF9-Mediated Exon Recognition Promotes Exon 2 Inclusion inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Alexia Martínez de PazDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Petch Building 260, Victoria, BC, V8W 3P6, Canada.
Leila KhajaviUnité de Mathématiques et Informatique Appliquées, Toulouse INRA, Auzeville, BP 52627, 31326, Castanet-Tolosan Cedex, France.
Hélène MartinCentre de Physiopathologie de Toulouse Purpan, INSERM, UMR 1043, CNRS, UMR 5282, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Rafael Claveria-GimenoInstitute of Biocomputation and Physics of Complex Systems (BIFI), Joint Units IQFR-CSIC-BIFI and GBsC-CSC-BIFI, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50018, Saragossa, Spain.
Susanne Tom DieckSynaptic Plasticity Department, Max-Planck-Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Manjinder S CheemaDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Petch Building 260, Victoria, BC, V8W 3P6, Canada.
Jose V Sanchez-MutSchool of Life Sciences, Brain Mind Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Malgorzata M MoksaMichael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Annaick CarlesMichael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Nick I BrodieUniversity of Victoria-Genome British Columbia Proteomics Centre, Vancouver Island Technology Park, #3101-4464 Markham Street, Victoria, BC, V8Z7X8, Canada.
Taimoor I SheikhMolecular Neuropsychiatry & Development (MiND) Lab, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, M5T 1R8, Canada.
Melissa E FreemanDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Petch Building 260, Victoria, BC, V8W 3P6, Canada.
Evgeniy V PetrotchenkoUniversity of Victoria-Genome British Columbia Proteomics Centre, Vancouver Island Technology Park, #3101-4464 Markham Street, Victoria, BC, V8Z7X8, Canada.
Christoph H BorchersUniversity of Victoria-Genome British Columbia Proteomics Centre, Vancouver Island Technology Park, #3101-4464 Markham Street, Victoria, BC, V8Z7X8, Canada.
Erin M SchumanSynaptic Plasticity Department, Max-Planck-Institute for Brain Research, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Matthias ZytnickiUnité de Mathématiques et Informatique Appliquées, Toulouse INRA, Auzeville, BP 52627, 31326, Castanet-Tolosan Cedex, France.
Adrian Velazquez-CampoyInstitute of Biocomputation and Physics of Complex Systems (BIFI), Joint Units IQFR-CSIC-BIFI and GBsC-CSC-BIFI, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50018, Saragossa, Spain.
Olga AbianInstitute of Biocomputation and Physics of Complex Systems (BIFI), Joint Units IQFR-CSIC-BIFI and GBsC-CSC-BIFI, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50018, Saragossa, Spain.
Martin HirstSchool of Life Sciences, Brain Mind Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Manel EstellerCancer Epigenetics and Biology Program (PEBC), Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Avinguda Gran Vía de L'Hospitalet 199-203. L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
John B VincentMolecular Neuropsychiatry & Development (MiND) Lab, Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, M5T 1R8, Canada.
Cécile E MalnouCentre de Physiopathologie de Toulouse Purpan, INSERM, UMR 1043, CNRS, UMR 5282, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Juan AusióDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Petch Building 260, Victoria, BC, V8W 3P6, Canada. jausio@uvic.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-9674-6717
University of Victoria · CACentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversidad de Zaragoza · ESUniversity of British Columbia · CACentre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAMax Planck Institute for Brain Research · DECornell University · USDépartement mathématiques, informatique, sciences de la donnée et technologies du numérique · FRÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ES

Funding

Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute CCSRI #703489CIHR MOP-102758CIHR MOP-130417European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program 727264 (EPIPHARM)European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program 743216 to EMSHealth and Science Departments of the Catalan Government (Generalitat de Catalunya) AGAUR [2014SGR633]Instituto de Salud Carlos III and co-funded by European Union PI15/00663Max Planck Society and DFG CRC 1080Max Planck Society and DFG CRC 902Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad BFU2013-47064-PSpanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad BFU2016-78232-PSpanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad SAF2014-55000-RTerry Fox Research Institute Program Project TFRI #1039University of Victoria-Genome BC Proteomics Centre 204PROUniversity of Victoria-Genome BC Proteomics Centre 214PRO
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeCP2-a chromatin-binding protein associated with Rett syndrome-has two main isoforms, MeCP2-E1 and MeCP2-E2, differing in a few N-terminal amino acid residues. Previous studies have shown brain region-specific expression of these isoforms which, in addition to their different cellular localization and differential expression during brain development, suggest that they may also have non-overlapping molecular mechanisms. However, differential functions of MeCP2-E1 and E2 remain largely unexplored.

resultsHere, we show that the N-terminal domains (NTD) of MeCP2-E1 and E2 modulate the ability of the methyl-binding domain (MBD) to interact with DNA as well as influencing the turn-over rates, binding dynamics, response to neuronal depolarization, and circadian oscillations of the two isoforms. Our proteomics data indicate that both isoforms exhibit unique interacting protein partners. Moreover, genome-wide analysis using ChIP-seq provide evidence for a shared as well as a specific regulation of different sets of genes.

conclusionsOur study supports the idea that Rett syndrome might arise from simultaneous impairment of cellular processes involving non-overlapping functions of MECP2 isoforms. For instance, MeCP2-E1 mutations might impact stimuli-dependent chromatin regulation, while MeCP2-E2 mutations could result in aberrant ribosomal expression. Overall, our findings provide insight into the functional complexity of MeCP2 by dissecting differential aspects of its two isoforms.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorChromatinCircadian RhythmDNAHumansMethyl-CpG-Binding Protein 2MiceMice, KnockoutNeuronsProtein BindingProtein DomainsProtein IsoformsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRett SyndromeChromatinDNAMethyl-CpG-Binding Protein 2Protein IsoformsChromatinIsoformsMeCP2Rett syndrome

Identifiers

PMID31601272
PMCPMC6786283
OpenAlexW2980037177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.