Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31601266›Full record

ReviewVeterinary research2019

Recent advances in delivery of veterinary DNA vaccines against avian pathogens.

Seyed Davoud Jazayeri, Chit Laa Poh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Advances inVaccines · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Livestock Antibiotics Use and Antimicrobial Resistance.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  8. Promising Vaccine Formulations for Emerging Infectious Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Microorganisms · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Seyed Davoud JazayeriCentre for Virus and Vaccine Research, School of Science and Technology, Sunway University, 47500, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.
Chit Laa PohCentre for Virus and Vaccine Research, School of Science and Technology, Sunway University, 47500, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia. pohcl@sunway.edu.my.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Veterinary vaccines need to have desired characteristics, such as being effective, inexpensive, easy to administer, suitable for mass vaccination and stable under field conditions. DNA vaccines have been proposed as potential solutions for poultry diseases since they are subunit vaccines with no risk of infection or reversion to virulence. DNA vaccines can be utilized for simultaneous immunizations against multiple pathogens and are relatively easy to design and inexpensive to manufacture and store. Administration of DNA vaccines has been shown to stimulate immune responses and provide protection from challenges in different animal models. Although DNA vaccines offer advantages, setbacks including the inability to induce strong immunity, and the fact that they are not currently applicable for mass vaccination impede the use of DNA vaccines in the poultry industry. The use of either biological or physical carriers has been proposed as a solution to overcome the current delivery limitations of DNA vaccines for veterinary applications. This review presents an overview of the recent development of carriers for delivery of veterinary DNA vaccines against avian pathogens.

Indexed as

AnimalsPoultry DiseasesVaccinationVaccines, DNAVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID31601266
PMCPMC6785882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.