Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31601251›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics & chromatin2019

DNA methylation is maintained with high fidelity in the honey bee germline and exhibits global non-functional fluctuations during somatic development.

Keith D Harris, James P B Lloyd, Katherine Domb, Daniel Zilberman, Assaf Zemach

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics & chromatin, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Reply to Maleszka et al.: DNA methylation signals persist across insect metamorphosis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Epigenetic Mechanisms inCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Keith D HarrisSchool of Plant Sciences and Food Security, Tel-Aviv University, 69978, Tel-Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-2162-9652
James P B LloydCenter for RNA Systems Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4492-1368
Katherine DombSchool of Plant Sciences and Food Security, Tel-Aviv University, 69978, Tel-Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-7113-2391
Daniel ZilbermanDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, John Innes Center, Norwich, UK. daniel.zilberman@jic.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0123-8649
Assaf ZemachSchool of Plant Sciences and Food Security, Tel-Aviv University, 69978, Tel-Aviv, Israel. assafze@tauex.tau.ac.il.ORCID 0000-0003-3282-4445
Tel Aviv University · ILJohn Innes Centre · GBThe University of Western Australia · AU

Funding

PROJECT 3P50GM102706 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI CATE, JAMIE H · 2012 to 2016
$9.5M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/J/000PR9773NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM102706NIH HHS GM102706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDNA methylation of active genes, also known as gene body methylation, is found in many animal and plant genomes. Despite this, the transcriptional and developmental role of such methylation remains poorly understood. Here, we explore the dynamic range of DNA methylation in honey bee, a model organism for gene body methylation.

resultsOur data show that CG methylation in gene bodies globally fluctuates during honey bee development. However, these changes cause no gene expression alterations. Intriguingly, despite the global alterations, tissue-specific CG methylation patterns of complete genes or exons are rare, implying robust maintenance of genic methylation during development. Additionally, we show that CG methylation maintenance fluctuates in somatic cells, while reaching maximum fidelity in sperm cells. Finally, unlike universally present CG methylation, we discovered non-CG methylation specifically in bee heads that resembles such methylation in mammalian brain tissue.

conclusionsBased on these results, we propose that gene body CG methylation can oscillate during development if it is kept to a level adequate to preserve function. Additionally, our data suggest that heightened non-CG methylation is a conserved regulator of animal nervous systems.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationAnimalsBeesCluster AnalysisDNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesExonsGene Expression RegulationGerm CellsInsect ProteinsIntronsLarvaMaleNervous SystemPrincipal Component AnalysisRNA SplicingSpermatozoaDNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesInsect ProteinsDNA methylationDNMT3EpigeneticsGene body methylationGermlineNon-CG methylation

Identifiers

PMID31601251
PMCPMC6786280
OpenAlexW2979489589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.