Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31601247›Full record

ArticleClinical epigenetics2019

DNA methylome-wide alterations associated with estrogen receptor-dependent effects of bisphenols in breast cancer.

Z Awada, R Nasr, R Akika, V Cahais, C Cuenin, M Zhivagui, Z Herceg, A Ghantous, N K Zgheib

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Endocrine Disruptors and Gynecological Malignancies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Ten Years of EWAS.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. In Vitro Effects of Emerging Bisphenols on Myocyte Differentiation and Insulin Responsiveness.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Z AwadaPharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Riad El-Solh, Beirut, 1107-2020, Lebanon.
R NasrAnatomy, Cell Biology and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
R AkikaPharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Riad El-Solh, Beirut, 1107-2020, Lebanon.
V CahaisEpigenetics group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Cours Albert Thomas, 69372, Lyon, France.
C CueninEpigenetics group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Cours Albert Thomas, 69372, Lyon, France.
M ZhivaguiEpigenetics group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Cours Albert Thomas, 69372, Lyon, France.
Z HercegEpigenetics group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Cours Albert Thomas, 69372, Lyon, France.
A GhantousEpigenetics group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Cours Albert Thomas, 69372, Lyon, France. GhantousA@iarc.fr.
N K ZgheibPharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Riad El-Solh, Beirut, 1107-2020, Lebanon. nk16@aub.edu.lb.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBisphenol A (BPA), an estrogen-like endocrine disruptor used in plastics, has been associated with development and promotion of breast cancer, so plastic manufacturers shifted towards less-studied analogs, BPF and BPS. Studying the associated DNA methylome-wide mechanisms of these derivatives is timely, particularly in comparison with BPA.

methodsWe assessed proliferation, cell cycle, and migration of breast cancer cells (estrogen receptor (ER)-positive: MCF-7 and ER-negative: MDA-MB-231) treated with BPF and BPS ± estrogen receptor inhibitor (ERI) in comparison to BPA ± ERI. RNA expression and activity of DNA (de)methylation enzymes and LINE-1 methylation were quantified. DNA methylome-wide analysis was evaluated in bisphenol-exposed cells and compared to clinical breast cancer data.

resultsThe three bisphenols caused ER-dependent increased proliferation and migration of MCF-7 but not MDA-MB-231 cells, with BPS being 10 times less potent than BPA and BPF. Although they have similar chemical structures, the three bisphenols induced differential DNA methylation alterations at several genomic clusters of or single CpG sites, with the majority of these being ER-dependent. At equipotent doses, BPA had the strongest effect on the methylome, followed by BPS then BPF. No pathways were enriched for BPF while BPA- and BPS-induced methylome alterations were enriched in focal adhesion, cGMP-PKG, and cancer pathways, which were also dysregulated in methylome-wide alterations comparing ER-positive breast cancer samples to adjacent normal tissues.

conclusionsThe three bisphenols have important epigenetic effects in breast cell lines, with those of BPA and BPS overlapping with cancer-related pathways in clinical breast cancer models. Hence, further investigation of their safety is warranted.

Indexed as

Benzhydryl CompoundsBisphenol A CompoundsBreast NeoplasmsCell CycleCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationCpG IslandsDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleFocal AdhesionsFulvestrantGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksHumansBenzhydryl Compoundsbisphenol ABisphenol A CompoundsFulvestrantPhenolsReceptors, EstrogenBPABPFBPSBreast cancerDNA methylationEndocrine disruptor

Identifiers

PMID31601247
PMCPMC6785895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.