Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31601207›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2019

Measurement and application of patient similarity in personalized predictive modeling based on electronic medical records.

Ni Wang, Yanqun Huang, Honglei Liu, Xiaolu Fei, Lan Wei, Xiangkun Zhao, Hui Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Comparative Analysis of Patient Similarity Measures for Outcome Prediction.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Patient similarity analytics for explainable clinical risk prediction.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021
    Article
  10. A Neuro-ontology for the neurological examination.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ni WangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, No. 10, Xitoutiao, YouAnMen, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100069, China.
Yanqun HuangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, No. 10, Xitoutiao, YouAnMen, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100069, China.
Honglei LiuSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, No. 10, Xitoutiao, YouAnMen, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100069, China.
Xiaolu FeiInformation Center, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, China.
Lan WeiInformation Center, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, China.
Xiangkun ZhaoSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, No. 10, Xitoutiao, YouAnMen, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100069, China.
Hui ChenSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, No. 10, Xitoutiao, YouAnMen, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100069, China. chenhui@ccmu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81671786National Natural Science Foundation of China 81701792National Natural Science Foundation of China 81901707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConventional risk prediction techniques may not be the most suitable approach for personalized prediction for individual patients. Therefore, individualized predictive modeling based on similar patients has emerged. This study aimed to propose a comprehensive measurement of patient similarity using real-world electronic medical records data, and evaluate the effectiveness of the individualized prediction of a patient's diabetes status based on the patient similarity.

resultsWhen using no more than 30% of the whole training sample, the personalized predictive models outperformed corresponding traditional models built on randomly selected training samples of the same size as the personalized models (P < 0.001 for all). With only the top 1000 (10%), 700 (7%) and 1400 (14%) similar samples, personalized random forest, k-nearest neighbor and logistic regression models reached the globally optimal performance with the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.90, 0.82 and 0.89, respectively.

conclusionsThe proposed patient similarity measurement was effective when developing personalized predictive models. The successful application of patient similarity in predicting a patient's diabetes status provided useful references for diagnostic decision-making support by investigating the evidence on similar patients.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsModels, StatisticalPrecision MedicineDiabetes MellitusHumansLogistic ModelsDiabetes mellitusElectronic medical recordsModel performancePatient similarityPersonalized prediction

Identifiers

PMID31601207
PMCPMC6788002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.