Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31601193›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2019

A qualitative cross-cultural analysis of NICU care culture and infant feeding in Finland and the U.S.

Sarah Holdren, Cynthia Fair, Liisa Lehtonen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah HoldrenDepartment of Pediatrics, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland. sholdren@elon.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5246-4961
Cynthia FairPublic Health Studies & Department Chair, Elon University Department of Public Health Studies, Elon, North Carolina, USA.
Liisa LehtonenDepartment of Pediatrics, Neonatology & Professor of Pediatrics, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Turku University Hospital · FIElon University · US

Funding

Elon University Lumen PrizeFulbright Finland Foundation U.S.Student GrantLois Roth Endowment Roth-Thompson Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe benefits of family-centered care for the health and well-being of preterm infants and their families include increased parent-infant closeness, improved lactation, and positive mental health outcomes; however, it is known that the extent to which family-centered care is adopted varies by unit. This study aimed to understand how differences in neonatal care culture in two units in Finland and the U.S. were translated to parents' infant feeding experiences in the hope of improving relationally focused feeding practices in both locations.

methodsThis qualitative, cross-sectional study utilized narrative methodologies to understand the lived experiences of 15 families hospitalized in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit in Finland (n = 8) and the U. S (n = 7).

resultsA global theme of lactation as a means or an end showed that lactation and infant feeding were framed differently in each location. The three supporting themes that explain families' perceptions of their transition to parenthood, support as a family unit, and experience with lactation include: universal early postnatal challenges; culture and space-dependent nursing support; and controlled or empowering breastfeeding experiences.

conclusionsCare culture plays a large role in framing all infant caring activities, including lactation and infant feeding. This study found that in the unit in Finland, breastfeeding was one method to achieve closeness with an infant, while in the unit in the U.S., pumping was only an end to promote infant nutritional health. Therefore, breastfeeding coupled with closeness was found to be supportive of a salutogenic, or health-promoting, care approach for the whole family.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingBreast Milk ExpressionFeeding MethodsAdultCross-Cultural ComparisonFamily NursingFemaleFinlandHospital Design and ConstructionHumansInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIntensive Care Units, NeonatalLactationMaleBreastfeedingCare cultureFamily-centered careFamily-integrated careInfant feedingNICUParent-infant closeness

Identifiers

PMID31601193
PMCPMC6785867
OpenAlexW2980044067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.