Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31601116›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of hospice & palliative care2020

Querying Patients With Cancer About Sexual Health and Sexual and Gender Minority Status: A Qualitative Study of Health-Care Providers.

Elizabeth Cathcart-Rake, Jennifer M O'Connor, Jennifer L Ridgeway, Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, Lois J Mc Guire, Eric A Olson, Judith S Kaur, Konstantinos Leventakos, Aminah Jatoi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of hospice & palliative care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Educational Initiatives to Improve the Cancer-Related Disparities Facing Transgender and Gender Diverse (TGD) Individuals.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Building a Cancer Care Clinic for Transgender and Gender Diverse Individuals.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elizabeth Cathcart-RakeDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3532-4913
Jennifer M O'ConnorDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jennifer L RidgewayRobert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Carmen Radecki BreitkopfDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Lois J Mc GuireDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rochester, MN, USA.
Eric A OlsonDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Judith S KaurDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Konstantinos LeventakosDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Aminah JatoiDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1081-189X

Funding

Collaborations and NCORP Collective ManagementUG1CA189823 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Evanthia Galanis, Olwen Hahn · 2014 to 2026
$120.6M
Naional Cancer Institute, Naitonal Clinical Trials Network U10 Lead Academic SiteU10CA180790 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ALBERTS, STEVEN R, BOUGHEY, JUDY CAROLINE · 2014 to 2018
$6.6M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180790NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough national organizations advocate that health-care providers ask patients about sexual health and sexual and gender minority status-to learn, for example, about side effects of treatment and to understand patients' social support-these conversations often do not occur. This study explored health-care providers' reasons for having/not having these conversations.

methodsThis single-institution study recruited health-care providers from medical oncology, hematology, radiation oncology, and gynecology. Face-to-face interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed qualitatively.

resultsThree main themes emerged: (1) patient-centric reasons for discussing/not discussing sexual health and sexual and gender minority status ("So I think just the holistic viewpoint is important"); (2) health-care provider-centric reasons for discussing/not discussing these issues ("That's going to take more time to talk about and to deal with…" or "I was raised orthodox, so this is not something we talk about…"; and (3) reasons that appeared to straddle both of the above themes (eg, acknowledgment of the sometimes taboo nature of these topics).

conclusionAlthough many health-care providers favor talking with patients with cancer about sexual health and sexual and gender minority status, limited time, personal reluctance, and the taboo nature of these topics appear at times to hamper the initiation of these conversations.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelSexual HealthFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicMaleNeoplasmsPatient-Centered CareProfessional-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchSexual and Gender MinoritiesTime Factorscancergenderhealth-care providerqualitativesexual healthside effects

Identifiers

PMID31601116
PMCPMC7145741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.