Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31601016›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2019

Three-Dimensional Bioprinting of Functional Skeletal Muscle Tissue Using GelatinMethacryloyl-Alginate Bioinks.

Rasoul Seyedmahmoud, Betül Çelebi-Saltik, Natan Barros, Rohollah Nasiri, Ethan Banton, Amir Shamloo, Nureddin Ashammakhi, Mehmet Remzi Dokmeci, Samad Ahadian

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Extrusion bioprinting: meeting the promise of human tissue biofabrication?Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Bioreactors, scaffolds and microcarriers andFrontiers in nutrition · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Rasoul SeyedmahmoudDepartment of Bioengineering, Samueli School of Engineering, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Betül Çelebi-SaltikDepartment of Bioengineering, Samueli School of Engineering, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Natan BarrosDepartment of Bioengineering, Samueli School of Engineering, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Rohollah NasiriDepartment of Bioengineering, Samueli School of Engineering, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Ethan BantonDepartment of Bioengineering, Samueli School of Engineering, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Amir ShamlooDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran 11365-11155, Iran.
Nureddin AshammakhiDepartment of Bioengineering, Samueli School of Engineering, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Mehmet Remzi DokmeciCenter for Minimally Invasive Therapeutics (C-MIT), University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Samad AhadianDepartment of Bioengineering, Samueli School of Engineering, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. ahadian123@ucla.edu.
University of California, Los Angeles · USSharif University of Technology · IR

Funding

3D printed muscle-bone organ implant for treating large injuriesR01AR073135 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DOKMECI, MEHMET REMZI, JANG, HAE LIN · 2018 to 2022
$2.2M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR073135NIH HHS R01-AR073135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skeletal muscle tissue engineering aims to fabricate tissue constructs to replace or restore diseased or injured skeletal muscle tissues in the body. Several biomaterials and microscale technologies have been used in muscle tissue engineering. However, it is still challenging to mimic the function and structure of the native muscle tissues. Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is a powerful tool to mimic the hierarchical structure of native tissues. Here, 3D bioprinting was used to fabricate tissue constructs using gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA)-alginate bioinks. Mechanical and rheological properties of GelMA-alginate hydrogels were characterized. C2C12 myoblasts at the density 8 × 10

Indexed as

3D bioprintingGelMA-alginate bioinkmuscle tissue engineeringoxygen-generating bioink

Identifiers

PMID31601016
PMCPMC6843821
OpenAlexW2980005384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.