Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31601015›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Liking Product Landscape: Going Deeper into Understanding Consumers' Hedonic Evaluations.

Claudia N Sánchez, Julieta Domínguez-Soberanes, Héctor B Escalona-Buendía, Mario Graff, Sebastián Gutiérrez, Gabriela Sánchez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Claudia N SánchezFacultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Panamericana, Aguascalientes 20290, Mexico. cnsanchez@up.edu.mx.ORCID 0000-0001-6316-5214
Julieta Domínguez-SoberanesEscuela de Negocios Gastronómicos, Universidad Panamericana, Aguascalientes 20290, Mexico. jdominguez@up.edu.mx.ORCID 0000-0001-8476-3352
Héctor B Escalona-BuendíaDepartamento de Biotecnología, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Iztapalapa, Ciudad de Mexico 09340, Mexico. hbeb@xanum.uam.mx.
Mario GraffCONACYT-INFOTEC Centro de Investigación e Innovación en Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicación, Aguascalientes 20313, Mexico. mario.graff@infotec.mx.ORCID 0000-0001-6573-4142
Sebastián GutiérrezFacultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Panamericana, Aguascalientes 20290, Mexico. jsgutierrez@up.edu.mx.ORCID 0000-0002-9622-4521
Gabriela SánchezEscuela de Negocios Gastronómicos, Universidad Panamericana, Aguascalientes 20290, Mexico. 0171350@up.edu.mx.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of graphical mapping for understanding the comparison of products based on consumers' perceptions is beneficial and easy to interpret. Internal preference mapping (IPM) and landscape segmentation analysis (LSA) have successfully been used for this propose. However, including all the consumers' evaluations in one map, with products' overall liking and attributes' perceptions, is complicated; because data is in a high dimensional space some information can be lost. To provide as much information as possible, we propose the liking product landscape (LPL) methodology where several maps are used for representing the consumers' distribution and evaluations. LPL shows the consumers' distribution, like LSA, and also it superimposes the consumers' evaluations. However, instead of superimposing the average overall liking in one map, this methodology uses different maps for each consumer's evaluation. Two experiments were performed where LPL was used for understanding the consumers' perceptions and compared with classic methodologies, IPM and cluster analysis, in order to validate the results. LPL can be successfully used for identifying consumers' segments, consumers' preferences, recognizing perception of product attributes by consumers' segments and identifying the attributes that need to be optimized.

Indexed as

consumers’ perceptionsconsumers’ preferencesdata analysisliking product landscapemarket segmentationsensory analysis

Identifiers

PMID31601015
PMCPMC6835790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.