Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31600967›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Simulation of the Effect of Material Properties on Soft Contact Lens On-Eye Power.

Joshua Moore, Bernardo T Lopes, Ashkan Eliasy, Brendan Geraghty, Richard Wu, Lynn White, Ahmed Elsheikh, Ahmed Abass

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Contact lens fitting and changes in the tear film dynamics: mathematical and computational models review.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Biomechanical evaluation of different plunger size and plunger position on removing soft contact lenses and rigid gas permeable contact lenses.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.

Joshua MooreSchool of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GH, UK. sgwmoore@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2233-2527
Bernardo T LopesSchool of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GH, UK. blopesmed@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8489-3621
Ashkan EliasySchool of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GH, UK. eliasy@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4473-1900
Brendan GeraghtySchool of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GH, UK. bren@liverpool.ac.uk.
Richard WuDepartment of Optometry, Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taichung 40601, Taiwan. richard.wu@brightenoptix.com.
Lynn WhiteUltraVision CLPL, Leighton Buzzard, Bedfordshire LU7 4RW, UK. Lynn@lwvision.co.uk.
Ahmed ElsheikhSchool of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GH, UK. elsheikh@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7456-1749
Ahmed AbassSchool of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GH, UK. A.Abass@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8622-4632
University of Liverpool · GBMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBPacific University Oregon · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the variation in the optical power achieved following soft contact lens eye fitting for spherical and cylindrical lenses with differing hydrogel material properties.

methodsUniaxial tensile tests were performed on four hydrogel materials 77% water-content (w-c) hydrogel, 74% w-c blue silicone hydrogel, 74% w-c clear silicone hydrogel, and 64% w-c clear hydrogel (shortly referred to as H77p0, SiH74p5-blue, SiH74p5-clear, and H64p0-clear), under loading conditions that would be expected in vivo. Finite element models of the cornea and contact lens interaction were generated using spherical and cylindrical lenses with powers varying from -10 to +20 D; overall diameters of either 13.5, 14.0, or 14.5 mm; and with material properties matching those determined through experimental testing.

resultsThe moduli of elasticity for each of the tested hydrogel materials were 0.195 ± 0.027 MPa, 0.277 ± 0.019 MPa, 0.279 ± 0.01 MPa, and 0.457 ± 0.013 MPa for H77p0, SiH74p5-blue, SiH74p5-clear, and H64p0 respectively. The calculated values of effective power change (EPC) showed strong negative correlations with lens power. This was particularly apparent in the higher end of the lens power spectrum (over +5 D), where each of the materials demonstrated a highly linear reduction in EPC with increased lens power.

conclusionsSoft contact lenses composed of a stiffer hydrogel are far more resilient to changes in EPC across the lower end of the lens power spectrum (-10 to +5 D). Beyond this range, the material choice does not have a significant effect on the EPC.

Indexed as

contact lenseshydrogeloff-eyeon-eyeoptical powersilicone hydrogel

Identifiers

PMID31600967
PMCPMC6956153
OpenAlexW2979632592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.