Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31600842›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2020

Disturbance regulates the density-body-mass relationship of soil fauna.

Frank van Langevelde, Vincent Comor, Steven de Bie, Herbert H T Prins, Madhav P Thakur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Disturbance regulates the density-body-mass relationship of soil fauna.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Frank van LangeveldeResource Ecology Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, Wageningen, 6708 PB, The Netherlands.
Vincent ComorResource Ecology Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, Wageningen, 6708 PB, The Netherlands.
Steven de BieResource Ecology Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, Wageningen, 6708 PB, The Netherlands.
Herbert H T PrinsResource Ecology Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, Wageningen, 6708 PB, The Netherlands.
Madhav P ThakurDepartment of Terrestrial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Droevendaalsesteeg 10, Wageningen, 6708 PB, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9426-1313

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theory on the density-body-mass (DBM) relationship predicts that the density of animal species decreases by the power of -0.75 per unit increase in their body mass, or by the power of -1 when taxa across trophic levels are studied. This relationship is, however, largely debated, as the slope often deviates from the theoretical predictions. Here, we tested the ability of the DBM relationship to reflect changes in the structure of communities subjected to an anthropogenic disturbance. The slope would become less steep if smaller animals were more impacted by the disturbance than the larger ones, whereas the slope would become steeper if larger animals were more affected than the smaller ones. We tested the changes in the DBM relationship by sampling soil fauna, i.e., nematodes, Collembola, and larger arthropods, from a semiarid grassland before and after spraying diesel fuel as disturbance. We applied three different treatments: a control, a light disturbance, and an intense disturbance. We found that the slopes of the DBM relationships before the disturbance were around -1 as predicted by theory. The slope became more positive (i.e., less steep) just after the disturbance, especially after the intense disturbance as smaller fauna suffered the most and early colonizers had larger body mass. Interestingly, we observed that the slopes converged back to -1 by 2 months post-disturbance. Our findings show that the response of soil fauna communities to anthropogenic disturbances could explain the large variation in observed slopes of the DBM relationships. We experimentally demonstrate that an animal community, when disturbed, shows a temporal pattern of DBM relationships ranging from deviations from the predicted slope to convergence to the predicted slope with time. We recommend that deviations in the DBM relationships after disturbances can provide insights in the trajectory of community recovery, and hence could be used for biomonitoring.

Indexed as

ArthropodsSoilAnimalsSoilabundance-mass relationshipbiomonitoringcommunity ecologypopulation densityrecoveryrestorationscaling laws

Identifiers

PMID31600842
PMCPMC7003476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.