Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31600508›Full record

ReviewNeuron2019

Computational Neuroethology: A Call to Action.

Sandeep Robert Datta, David J Anderson, Kristin Branson, Pietro Perona, Andrew Leifer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuron, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 226 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
226citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

226 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ecological Visual Processing in the Mouse.Annual review of neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Automated Profiling of Social Behaviors to Assess the Genetic Basis of Evolution of Aggressive Behaviors in Astyanax mexicanus.Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Predictive pursuit emerges in high-dimensional recurrent neural networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Visualizing and sonifying neurodata (ViSoND) for enhanced observation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  17. A spinal substrate for modular control of natural behavior.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

166 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sandeep Robert DattaDepartment of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: srdatta@hms.harvard.edu.
David J AndersonDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering 156-29, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA; Tianqiao and Chrissy Chen Institute for Neuroscience, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Kristin BransonJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA 20147, USA.
Pietro PeronaDivision of Engineering & Applied Sciences 136-93, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Andrew LeiferDepartment of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA; Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. Electronic address: leifer@princeton.edu.

Funding

Towards a Unified Framework for Dopamine Signaling in the StriatumU19NS113201 · NINDS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI DATTA, SANDEEP R · 2019 to 2023
$18.7M
The Structure of Olfactory Neural and Perceptual SpacesU19NS112953 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI RINBERG, DMITRY · 2019 to 2023
$18.4M
Characterizing the Functional Architecture of the Necklace Olfactory SystemR01DC016222 · NIDCD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI DATTA, SANDEEP R · 2017 to 2021
$2.8M
Motion Sequencing for All: Pipelining, Distribution and Training to Enable Broad Adoption of a Next-Generation Platform for Behavioral and Neurobehavioral AnalysisU24NS109520 · NINDS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI DATTA, SANDEEP R · 2019 to 2024
$2.3M
CounterAct Administrative Supplement to NS114020 Automated Phenotyping in EpilepsyR01NS114020 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DATTA, SANDEEP R, SOLTESZ, IVAN · 2019 to 2023
$2.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016222NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS114020NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS112953NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS113201NINDS NIH HHS U24 NS109520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain is worthy of study because it is in charge of behavior. A flurry of recent technical advances in measuring and quantifying naturalistic behaviors provide an important opportunity for advancing brain science. However, the problem of understanding unrestrained behavior in the context of neural recordings and manipulations remains unsolved, and developing approaches to addressing this challenge is critical. Here we discuss considerations in computational neuroethology-the science of quantifying naturalistic behaviors for understanding the brain-and propose strategies to evaluate progress. We point to open questions that require resolution and call upon the broader systems neuroscience community to further develop and leverage measures of naturalistic, unrestrained behavior, which will enable us to more effectively probe the richness and complexity of the brain.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBrainElectrophysiological PhenomenaEthologyNeurosciences

Identifiers

PMID31600508
PMCPMC6981239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.