Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31600486›Full record

ArticleExperimental eye research2019

Extracting the ON and OFF contributions to the full-field photopic flash electroretinogram using summed growth curves.

James D Akula, Lucia Ambrosio, Fiona I Howard, Ronald M Hansen, Anne B Fulton

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental eye research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

James D AkulaOphthalmology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States. Electronic address: xImtc@yahoo.com.
Lucia AmbrosioOphthalmology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Fiona I HowardOphthalmology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States.
Ronald M HansenOphthalmology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Anne B FultonOphthalmology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Boston Children's Hospital · USHarvard University · USNortheastern University · US

Funding

Photoreceptor Function in ROPR01EY010597 · NEI · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI FULTON, ANNE B · 1994 to 2023
$10.7M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY010597
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Under cone-mediated (photopic) conditions, an "instantaneous" flash of light, including both stimulus onset and offset, will simultaneously activate both "ON" and "OFF" bipolar cells, which either depolarize (ON) or hyperpolarize (OFF) in response and, respectively, produce positive-going and negative-going deflections in the electroretinogram (ERG). The stimulus-response (SR) relationship of the photopic ON response demonstrates logistic growth, like that manifested in the rod-mediated (scotopic) b-wave, which is driven by a single class of depolarizing bipolar cell. However, the photopic b-wave SR function is importantly shaped by OFF responses, leading to a "photopic hill." Furthermore, both on and off stimuli elicit activity in both ON and OFF bipolar cells. This has made it difficult to produce meaningful parameters for ready interpretation of the photopic b-wave SR relationship. Therefore, we evaluated whether the sum of sigmoidal SR functions, as descriptors of the depolarizing and hyperpolarizing components of the photopic flash ERG, could be used to elucidate and quantitate the mechanisms that produce the photopic hill. We used a novel fitting routine to optimize a sum of simple sigmoidal curves to SR data in five groups of subjects: Healthy adult, 10-week-old infant, congenital stationary night blindness (CSNB), X-linked juvenile retinoschisis (XJR), and preterm-born, both without and with a history of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Differences in ON and OFF amplitude, sensitivity, and implicit time among the groups were then compared using parameters extracted from these fits. We found that our modeling procedure enabled plausible derivations of ON and OFF pathway contributions to the ERG, and that the parameters produced appeared to have physiological relevance. In adult subjects, the ON and OFF amplitudes were similar in magnitude with respectively longer and shorter implicit times. Infant, CSNB, and XJR subjects showed significant ON pathway deficits. History of preterm-birth, without or with a diagnosis of ROP, did not much affect cone responses.

Indexed as

Color VisionAdultDark AdaptationElectroretinographyEye Diseases, HereditaryFemaleGenetic Diseases, X-LinkedHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMyopiaNight BlindnessPhotic StimulationRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsRetinopathy of Prematurity

Identifiers

PMID31600486
PMCPMC6956400
OpenAlexW2980057845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.