Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31600481›Full record

ReviewPublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)

Reducing Health Care Disparities in Sickle Cell Disease: A Review.

LaTasha Lee, Kim Smith-Whitley, Sonja Banks, Gary Puckrein

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 131 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
131citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

131 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 224 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Humanistic and economic burden among caregivers of adults and children with sickle cell disease and recurrent vaso-occlusive crises.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Advances and Gaps in Global Newborn Screening for Sickle Cell Disease.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

71 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

LaTasha LeeDepartment of Clinical Research & Leadership, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5203-4104
Kim Smith-WhitleyComprehensive Sickle Cell Center, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Sonja BanksSickle Cell Disease Association of America, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Gary PuckreinNational Minority Quality Forum, Washington, DC, USA.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USGeorge Washington University · USNational Quality Forum · USSickle Cell Disease Association of America · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited blood disorder most common among African American and Hispanic American persons. The disease can cause substantial, long-term, and costly health problems, including infections, stroke, and kidney failure, many of which can reduce life expectancy. Disparities in receiving health care among African Americans and other racial/ethnic minority groups in the United States are well known and directly related to poor outcomes associated with SCD. As an orphan disease-one that affects <200 000 persons nationwide-SCD does not receive the research funding and pharmaceutical investment directed to other orphan diseases. For example, cystic fibrosis affects fewer than half the number of persons but receives 3.5 times the funding from the National Institutes of Health and 440 times the funding from national foundations. In this review, we discuss the health inequities affecting persons with SCD, describe programs intended to improve their care, and identify actions that could be taken to further reduce these inequities, improve care, control treatment costs, and ease the burden of disease.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityAnemia, Sickle CellBlack or African AmericanHealth Care CostsHealthcare DisparitiesHispanic or LatinoHumansInsurance CoverageUnited Statesaccess to carecommunity health centershealth care disparitiesMedicaidsickle cell disease

Identifiers

PMID31600481
PMCPMC6832089
OpenAlexW2979630446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.