Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31600474›Full record

ArticleLanguage, speech, and hearing services in schools2019

The Impact of Dose and Dose Frequency on Word Learning by Kindergarten Children With Developmental Language Disorder During Interactive Book Reading.

Holly L Storkel, Rouzana Komesidou, Mollee J Pezold, Adrienne R Pitt, Kandace K Fleming, Rebecca Swinburne Romine

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Language, speech, and hearing services in schools, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Spoken Word Learning in Children With Developmental Language Disorder or Dyslexia.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. The Fast-Mapping Abilities of Adults With Developmental Language Disorder.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Holly L StorkelDepartment of Speech-Language-Hearing: Sciences & Disorders, University of Kansas, Lawrence.
Rouzana KomesidouDepartment of Speech-Language-Hearing: Sciences & Disorders, University of Kansas, Lawrence.
Mollee J PezoldDepartment of Speech-Language-Hearing: Sciences & Disorders, University of Kansas, Lawrence.
Adrienne R PittDepartment of Speech-Language-Hearing: Sciences & Disorders, University of Kansas, Lawrence.
Kandace K FlemingLife Span Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence.
Rebecca Swinburne RomineLife Span Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence.

Funding

RADx-UP: Improving the Response of Local Urban and Rural Communities to Disparities in Covid-19 TestingUL1TR002366 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Mario Castro, JAMES STEVEN LEEDER · 2017 to 2026
$44.3M
Using PCORnet to Expand the DS-CONNECT Cohort Through Healthcare System Recruitment, Incorporating Electronic Health Records, and Assessing Self-DeterminationU54HD090216 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI COLOMBO, JOHN A. · 2016 to 2020
$6.2M
Interactive book reading to accelerate word learning by children with SLIR01DC012824 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI SWINBURNE ROMINE, REBECCA · 2013 to 2022
$3.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002366NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD090216NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012824
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose The goal was to determine whether interactive book reading outcomes for children with developmental language disorder (DLD) were affected by manipulation of dose (i.e., the number of exposures to the target word during a book reading session) and dose frequency (i.e., the number of repeated book reading sessions) and whether pretreatment factors predicted treatment response variation. Method Thirty-four kindergarten children with DLD (aged 5;0-6;2 [years;months]) were taught 1 set of words using the Dose 6 and Dose Frequency 6 format from a prior study (Storkel, Voelmle, et al., 2017) and taught a different set of words using an alternative format, either Dose 4 × Dose Frequency 9 or Dose 9 × Dose Frequency 4, determined through random assignment. Word learning was tracked for each treatment via a definition task prior to, during, and after treatment. Results Results showed that children with DLD learned a significant number of words during treatment regardless of the dose and dose frequency format but that significant forgetting of newly learned words occurred in all formats once treatment was withdrawn. Individual differences in word learning were related to Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals Core Language and Understanding Spoken Paragraphs scores. Conclusion When administered at an adequate intensity, variation in the dose and dose frequency of interactive book reading does not appear to influence word learning by children with DLD. Although interactive book reading continues to show promise as an effective word learning intervention for children with DLD, further development is needed to enhance the effectiveness of this treatment approach. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.9745181.

Indexed as

Language DevelopmentReadingVerbal LearningVocabularyBooksChildChild LanguageChild, PreschoolComprehensionFemaleHumansLanguageLanguage Development DisordersLanguage TestsLearningMale

Identifiers

PMID31600474
PMCPMC7210430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.