Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31600457›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of entomology2020

Ecology of

Sam R Telford, Heidi K Goethert

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of entomology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Why are the ticks winning, and what can we do about it?Ticks and tick-borne diseases · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Confirmed Case of Longstanding Respiratory Francisella tularensis holarctica Infection: Nebraska, 2022.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Non-vaccinal prophylaxis of tularemia.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sam R TelfordDepartment of Infectious Disease and Global Health and New England Regional Biosafety Laboratory, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, Massachusetts 01536, USA; email: sam.telford@tufts.edu.
Heidi K GoethertDepartment of Infectious Disease and Global Health and New England Regional Biosafety Laboratory, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, Massachusetts 01536, USA; email: sam.telford@tufts.edu.
Tufts University · US

Funding

Emergence of tick borne encephalitis in North AmericaR01AI137424 · NIAID · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI EBEL, GREGORY DAVID, TELFORD, SAM R · 2019 to 2023
$2.5M
Perpetuation of Francisella tularensisR01AI064218 · NIAID · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI TELFORD, SAM R · 2006 to 2010
$1.9M
Retrotransposon assay for tick host bloodmeal identificationR01AI130105 · NIAID · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI TELFORD, SAM R · 2018 to 2021
$1.6M
Proximal determinants of risk for tularemia outbreaksR21AI053411 · NIAID · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI TELFORD, SAM R. · 2003 to 2004
$476k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI064218NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI130105NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI137424NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI053411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tularemia is a Holarctic zoonosis caused by the gamma proteobacterium

Indexed as

Francisella tularensisAnimalsArthropod VectorsBiological EvolutionTularemiaarthropodsecologyFrancisella tularensismaintenancenatural focitularemia

Identifiers

PMID31600457
PMCPMC8300880
OpenAlexW2979886523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.