Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31600388›Full record

ReviewHuman reproduction update2019

Ovarian damage from chemotherapy and current approaches to its protection.

N Spears, F Lopes, A Stefansdottir, V Rossi, M De Felici, R A Anderson, F G Klinger

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human reproduction update, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 336 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
336citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
37.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

336 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 635 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. TSG FromFood science & nutrition · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Anti-Müllerian hormone and somatic ovarian function: a new perspective.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

276 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

N SpearsBiomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh UK.
F LopesBiomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh UK.
A StefansdottirBiomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh UK.
V RossiDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
M De FeliciDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
R A AndersonMRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh UK.
F G KlingerDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
University of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · ITMRC Centre for Reproductive Health · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1100357Medical Research Council MR/N022556/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnti-cancer therapy is often a cause of premature ovarian insufficiency and infertility since the ovarian follicle reserve is extremely sensitive to the effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. While oocyte, embryo and ovarian cortex cryopreservation can help some women with cancer-induced infertility achieve pregnancy, the development of effective methods to protect ovarian function during chemotherapy would be a significant advantage. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: This paper critically discusses the different damaging effects of the most common chemotherapeutic compounds on the ovary, in particular, the ovarian follicles and the molecular pathways that lead to that damage. The mechanisms through which fertility-protective agents might prevent chemotherapy drug-induced follicle loss are then reviewed. SEARCH

methodsArticles published in English were searched on PubMed up to March 2019 using the following terms: ovary, fertility preservation, chemotherapy, follicle death, adjuvant therapy, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, doxorubicin. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to the analysis of the protective agents. OUTCOMES: Recent studies reveal how chemotherapeutic drugs can affect the different cellular components of the ovary, causing rapid depletion of the ovarian follicular reserve. The three most commonly used drugs, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin and doxorubicin, cause premature ovarian insufficiency by inducing death and/or accelerated activation of primordial follicles and increased atresia of growing follicles. They also cause an increase in damage to blood vessels and the stromal compartment and increment inflammation. In the past 20 years, many compounds have been investigated as potential protective agents to counteract these adverse effects. The interactions of recently described fertility-protective agents with these damage pathways are discussed. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: Understanding the mechanisms underlying the action of chemotherapy compounds on the various components of the ovary is essential for the development of efficient and targeted pharmacological therapies that could protect and prolong female fertility. While there are increasing preclinical investigations of potential fertility preserving adjuvants, there remains a lack of approaches that are being developed and tested clinically.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCisplatinCryopreservationCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinFemaleFertilityFertility PreservationHumansInfertility, FemaleOocytesOvarian FollicleOvarian ReservePregnancyPrimary Ovarian InsufficiencyAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinadjuvant therapychemotherapycisplatincyclophosphamidedoxorubicinfertility preservationfollicle deathovarian reserveprotective therapies

Identifiers

PMID31600388
PMCPMC6847836
OpenAlexW2980216096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.