Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31600340›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Inhaled nebulized glatiramer acetate against Gram-negative bacteria is not associated with adverse pulmonary reactions in healthy, young adult female pigs.

Sandra M Skovdal, Stig Hill Christiansen, Karen Singers Johansen, Ole Viborg, Niels Henrik Bruun, Søren Jensen-Fangel, Ida Elisabeth Holm, Thomas Vorup-Jensen, Eskild Petersen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Compiling Evidence for EVALI: A Scoping Review of In Vivo Pulmonary Effects After Inhaling Vitamin E or Vitamin E Acetate.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sandra M SkovdalDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2602-197X
Stig Hill ChristiansenBiophysical Immunology Laboratory, Department of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Karen Singers JohansenDepartment of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ole ViborgIntensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark.
Niels Henrik BruunBiostatistical Advisory Service (BIAS), Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Søren Jensen-FangelDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark.
Ida Elisabeth HolmDepartment of Pathology, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.
Thomas Vorup-JensenBiophysical Immunology Laboratory, Department of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Eskild PetersenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKRegional Hospital Randers · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The developmental speed of new antimicrobials does not meet the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria sufficiently. A potential shortcut is assessing the antimicrobial activity of already approved drugs. Intrudingly, the antibacterial action of glatiramer acetate (GA) has recently been discovered. GA is a well-known and safe immunomodulatory drug particular effective against Gram-negative bacteria, which disrupts biological membranes by resembling the activity of antimicrobial peptides. Thus, GA can potentially be included in treatment strategies used to combat infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negatives. One potential application is chronic respiratory infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, however the safety of GA inhalation has never been assessed. Here, the safety of inhaling nebulized GA is evaluated in a preclinical pig model. The potential side effects, i.e., bronchoconstriction, respiratory tract symptoms and systemic- and local inflammation were assessed by ventilator monitoring, clinical observation, biochemistry, flowcytometry, and histopathology. No signs of bronchoconstriction assessed by increased airway peak pressure, Ppeak, or decreased oxygen pressure were observed. Also, there were no signs of local inflammation in the final histopathology examination of the pulmonary tissue. As we did not observe any potential pulmonary side effects of inhaled GA, our preliminary results suggest that GA inhalation is safe and potentially can be a part of the treatment strategy targeting chronic lung infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.

Indexed as

Nebulizers and VaporizersAdministration, InhalationAnimalsBronchiBronchoconstrictionFemaleGlatiramer AcetateGram-Negative BacteriaLeukocyte CountLungMannitolMucous MembraneSwineGlatiramer AcetateMannitol

Identifiers

PMID31600340
PMCPMC6786617
OpenAlexW2980121200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.