Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31600299›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Synbiotic supplementation to decrease Salmonella colonization in the intestine and carcass contamination in broiler birds.

R Shanmugasundaram, M Mortada, D E Cosby, M Singh, T J Applegate, B Syed, C M Pender, S Curry, G R Murugesan, R K Selvaraj

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Protective Effect of Synbiotic Supplementation AgainstAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Effect of Synbiotics on Hygienic Quality of Feed and Pork.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  4. Relationship BetweenVeterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Orally delivered chitosan-basedFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Microorganisms · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Effect of red ginger powder (Veterinary world · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Inhibition ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R ShanmugasundaramDepartment of Poultry Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0546-6902
M MortadaDepartment of Poultry Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States of America.
D E CosbyUSDA-ARS, Athens, GA, United States of America.
M SinghDepartment of Poultry Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States of America.
T J ApplegateDepartment of Poultry Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States of America.
B SyedBIOMIN Holding GmbH, Getzersdorf, Austria.
C M PenderBIOMIN America Inc., Overland Park, KS, United States of America.
S CurryBIOMIN America Inc., Overland Park, KS, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9842-368X
G R MurugesanBIOMIN America Inc., Overland Park, KS, United States of America.
R K SelvarajDepartment of Poultry Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States of America.
University of Georgia · USAgricultural Research Service · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro and in vivo experiments were conducted to study the effects of synbiotic supplementation on Salmonella enterica ser. Enteritidis (SE) proliferation, cecal content load, and broiler carcass contamination. Lactobacillus reuteri, Enterococcus faecium, Bifidobacterium animalis, and Pediococcus acidilactici culture supernatants decreased (P < 0.05) the in vitro proliferation of SE at 1:1 supernatant: pathogen dilution. A total of 240 Cobb-500 broiler chicks were randomly allotted to three treatment groups (8 replicates/group with 10 birds/replicate): control (basal diet), antibiotic (Virginiamycin at 20 mg/kg feed), synbiotic (PoultryStar® ME at 0.5 g/kg feed containing L. reuteri, E. faecium, B. animalis, P. acidilactici and a Fructooligosaccharide) from day of hatch. At 21 d of age, all birds in experimental groups were orally inoculated with 250 μl of 1 X 109 CFU SE. Antibiotic supplementation increased (P < 0.05) body weight and feed consumption, compared to the control group. Birds in the synbiotic supplementation had intermediate body weight and feed consumption that were not significantly different from both the control and antibiotic group at 42 d of age in SE infected birds. No significant effects were observed in feed efficiency at 42 d of age among the groups. Antibiotic and synbiotic supplementation decreased (P < 0.05) SE load in cecal contents by 0.90 and 0.85 log units/ g and carcass SE load by 1.4 and 1.5 log units/mL of rinsate compared to the control group at 42 d of age (21 dpi). The relative abundance of IL-10, IL-1, TLR-4, and IFNγ mRNA was decreased (P < 0.05) in the antibiotic and synbiotic supplementation groups compared to the control birds at 42 d of age (21 dpi). It can be concluded that synbiotic supplementation decreased SE proliferation in vitro and decreased SE load in the cecal contents and broiler carcass.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAnimalsCecumChickensGene Expression RegulationIntestinesRNA, MessengerSalmonellaSalmonella Infections, AnimalSynbioticsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID31600299
PMCPMC6786831
OpenAlexW2980020392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.