ArticlePloS one2019
Differences in perceived popularity and social preference between bullying roles and class norms.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pressured to climb the social ladder: the role of popularity, social preference, and parents and friends in adolescents' popularity-motivated aggression.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Norm Misperception and Witnessing Bullying: The Role of Individual and Contextual Characteristics.Journal of adolescence · 2025Article
- How Affective Relationships and Classroom Norms Shape Perceptions of Aggressor, Victim, and Defender Roles.Aggressive behavior · 2025Article
- The Relationship between a Competitive School Climate and School Bullying among Secondary Vocational School Students in China: A Moderated Mediation Model.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Aggressive and Defensive Behaviour, Normative, and Social Adjustment in the Complex Dynamics of School Bullying.Psychosocial intervention · 2023Article
- Vocal Expression of Affective States in Spontaneous Laughter reveals the Bright and the Dark Side of Laughter.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Bullying behaviours and other conduct problems: longitudinal investigation of their independent associations with risk factors and later outcomes.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2021Article
- The Effects of Forgiveness, Gratitude, and Self-Control on Reactive and Proactive Aggression in Bullying.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Influence of Personality Traits and Its Interaction with the Phenomenon of Bullying: Multi-Centre Descriptive Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Social status and friendship in peer victimization trajectories.International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine differences in perceived popularity and social preference of bullying roles and class norms. In total, 1,339 students (48% girls) participated: 674 primary school (M = 10.41 years, SD = 0.49) and 685 secondary school students (M = 12.67 years, SD = 0.80). Peer nominations and perceptions of class norms were collected. The results showed the highest perceived popularity among aggressors and defenders, except in anti-bullying primary school classes, where aggressors had low levels of popularity. In pro-bullying secondary school classes school, female victims had the lowest popularity levels. These findings suggest that class norms and personal variables as gender and school levels are important to understand bullying roles. Practical implications are discussed to guide teachers and practitioners according to the importance to adapt antibullying programs to the characteristics of the group in each school level and gender.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.