Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31600279›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2019

Does antibiotic use accelerate or retard cutaneous repair? A systematic review in animal models.

Luciana Schulthais Altoé, Raul Santos Alves, Mariáurea Matias Sarandy, Mônica Morais-Santos, Rômulo Dias Novaes, Reggiani Vilela Gonçalves

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Isoorientin Improves Excisional Skin Wound Healing in Mice.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Deferiprone-Gallium-Protoporphyrin Chitogel DecreasesMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Kick-Starting Wound Healing: A Review of Pro-Healing Drugs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Skin Wound Healing Rate in Fish Depends on Species and Microbiota.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The effect ofAging · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luciana Schulthais AltoéDepartament of General Biology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Raul Santos AlvesDepartament of General Biology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Mariáurea Matias SarandyDepartament of Animal Biology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Mônica Morais-SantosDepartament of Animal Biology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Rômulo Dias NovaesDepartament of Structural Biology, Federal University of Alfenas, Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3186-5328
Reggiani Vilela GonçalvesDepartament of Animal Biology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Viçosa · BRUniversidade Federal de Alfenas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe presence of infections is one of the main factors that leads to delays in healing or non-closure of cutaneous wounds. Although the goal of antibiotic use is to treat or prevent infection, there is currently no agreement on the effectiveness of these products.

aimThe aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic use during the healing process of skin wounds in animal models not intentionally infected, as well as to analyze the advances and limitations of the studies carried out in this field. MAIN

methodsThis systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines, using a structured search on the MedLine (PubMed) and Scopus platforms to retrieve studies published until August 29, 2018, 13:35p.m. The studies included were limited to those that used excision or incision wound models and that were not intentionally infected. The data for the animal models, antibiotic used, and the main results of the studies were extracted, and compared where possible. Bias analysis and methodological quality assessments were examined through the SYRCLE's Risk of Bias tool. KEY

findingsTwenty-seven studies were selected. Overall, the effects of the antibiotic on the wound decreased inflammatory cell infiltration and promoted an increased number of fibroblasts, extracellular matrix constituents, re-epithelialization and tissue strength. A great deal of important information about the methodology was not presented, such as: the statistical analysis used, the animal model (sex and age), antibiotic dosage, blinding and randomization of the animals chosen. SIGNIFICANCE: Based on the results found, we believe that antibiotic therapy can be considered a viable alternative for the treatment of cutaneous wounds. However, current evidence obtained from the methodological quality analysis points towards a high risk of bias. This is due to the incomplete characterization of the experimental design and treatment protocol, which compromises the reproducibility of the studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDisease Models, AnimalPublication BiasPublicationsRiskWound HealingAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID31600279
PMCPMC6786583
OpenAlexW2979899870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.