ArticlePloS one2019
Grouping of complex substances using analytical chemistry data: A framework for quantitative evaluation and visualization.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hyperparameter Optimization of Non-linear Machine Learning Models Using Bi-level Data-Driven Optimization.Computers & chemical engineering · 2026Article
- Toxicity of representative organophosphate, organochlorine, phenylurea, dinitroaniline, carbamate, and viologen pesticides to the growth and survival of H. vulgaris, L. minor, and C. elegans.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2024Article
- Machine Learning Methods for Endocrine Disrupting Potential Identification Based on Single-Cell Data.Chemical engineering science · 2023Article
- The Effects of Visual Complexity and Task Difficulty on the Comprehensive Cognitive Efficiency of Cluster Separation Tasks.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Targeted Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) assessments for high throughput screening: Analytical and testing considerations to inform a PFAS stock quality evaluation framework.Toxicology and applied pharmacology · 2023Article
- Analytical chemistry solutions to hazard evaluation of petroleum refining products.Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP · 2023Review
- Binary Classification of the Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals by Artificial Neural Networks.ESCAPE. European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering · 2023Article
- Characterization of Compositional Variability in Petroleum Substances.Fuel (London, England) · 2022Article
- Grouping of UVCB substances with dose-response transcriptomics data from human cell-based assays.ALTEX · 2022Article
- Data Processing Workflow to Identify Structurally Related Compounds in Petroleum Substances Using Ion Mobility Spectrometry-Mass Spectrometry.Energy & fuels : an American Chemical Society journal · 2021Article
- Article
- A Comparative Analysis of Analytical Techniques for Rapid Oil Spill Identification.Environmental toxicology and chemistry · 2021Article
- Predicting the Estrogen Receptor Activity of Environmental Chemicals by Single-Cell Image Analysis and Data-driven Modeling.ESCAPE. European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering · 2021Article
- Article
- A data-driven optimization algorithm for differential algebraic equations with numerical infeasibilities.AIChE journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers · 2020Article
- Classification of estrogenic compounds by coupling high content analysis and machine learning algorithms.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Article
- In Vitro Bioavailability of the Hydrocarbon Fractions of Dimethyl Sulfoxide Extracts of Petroleum Substances.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A detailed characterization of the chemical composition of complex substances, such as products of petroleum refining and environmental mixtures, is greatly needed in exposure assessment and manufacturing. The inherent complexity and variability in the composition of complex substances obfuscate the choices for their detailed analytical characterization. Yet, in lieu of exact chemical composition of complex substances, evaluation of the degree of similarity is a sensible path toward decision-making in environmental health regulations. Grouping of similar complex substances is a challenge that can be addressed via advanced analytical methods and streamlined data analysis and visualization techniques. Here, we propose a framework with unsupervised and supervised analyses to optimally group complex substances based on their analytical features. We test two data sets of complex oil-derived substances. The first data set is from gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis of 20 Standard Reference Materials representing crude oils and oil refining products. The second data set consists of 15 samples of various gas oils analyzed using three analytical techniques: GC-MS, GC×GC-flame ionization detection (FID), and ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry (IM-MS). We use hierarchical clustering using Pearson correlation as a similarity metric for the unsupervised analysis and build classification models using the Random Forest algorithm for the supervised analysis. We present a quantitative comparative assessment of clustering results via Fowlkes-Mallows index, and classification results via model accuracies in predicting the group of an unknown complex substance. We demonstrate the effect of (i) different grouping methodologies, (ii) data set size, and (iii) dimensionality reduction on the grouping quality, and (iv) different analytical techniques on the characterization of the complex substances. While the complexity and variability in chemical composition are an inherent feature of complex substances, we demonstrate how the choices of the data analysis and visualization methods can impact the communication of their characteristics to delineate sufficient similarity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.