Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31600011›Full record

ArticlePaediatric and perinatal epidemiology2020

The use of personal and indoor air pollution monitors in reproductive epidemiology studies.

Audrey J Gaskins, Jaime E Hart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Audrey J GaskinsDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0003-0812-7439
Jaime E HartDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES000002 · NIEHS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI SUSAN A KORRICK · 1985 to 2026
$44.6M
Training Program in Environmental EpidemiologyT32ES007069 · NIEHS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI LADEN, FRANCINE · 1985 to 2024
$13.9M
Project 3: Cumulative Risk and Geospatial Health Disparities Related to Chemical and Non-Chemical Stressor ExposuresP50MD010428 · NIMHD · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI LADEN, FRANCINE · 2015 to 2020
$4.0M
The effects of environmental exposures on semen quality and the sperm epigenomeR01ES028712 · NIEHS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI HART, JAIME ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2022
$3.3M
Maternal Exposure to Air Pollution and Early Pregnancy OutcomesR00ES026648 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GASKINS, AUDREY JANE · 2019 to 2021
$730k
EPA RD83615601NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES000002NIEHS NIH HHS P30ES000002NIEHS NIH HHS R00 ES026648NIEHS NIH HHS R00ES026648NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES028712NIEHS NIH HHS R01ES028712NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007069NIMHD NIH HHS P50 MD010428NIMHD NIH HHS P50MD010428
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersonal and indoor air pollution monitors represent two ways to assess acute air pollution exposures; however, few reproductive epidemiology studies have incorporated these tools.

objectiveTo provide an overview of the unique challenges and opportunities that arise when measuring acute exposure to air pollution in two ongoing reproductive epidemiology studies.

methodsThe Air Pollution, In Vitro Fertilization (IVF), and Reproductive Outcomes (AIR) Study recruits women undergoing IVF to wear a personal particulate matter (PM) air pollution monitor (AirBeam2©) for the 72-hour period following the start of controlled ovarian stimulation. The Reproductive Effects of Chemicals and Air Pollutants (RECAP) Study recruits men across the United States to place an air pollution monitor (emmET) in their home for 3 months, use a smartphone application, and provide a semen sample. We highlight the key issues identified in implementing exposure assessment for both studies.

resultsThe main advantages of using the AirBeam2© personal monitor are as follows: (a) the low cost, (b) the ability to collect multiple size fractions of PM data every second, (c) the portability, (d) its capability to track GPS location, and (e) the ability for the participant to observe their real-time exposure information. The limited battery life, incompatibility with iOS-based smartphones, and frequent connection issues that arise between the AirBeam2© and smartphone are the main disadvantages. The main advantages of the emmET are the ability to measure multiple air pollutants at a high level of accuracy, collect data for a long period of time without burdening the participant, and ship monitors to participants around the country without the need for in-person set-up by trained technicians; however, the monitor only measures the indoor home environment.

conclusionsNovel methods can be utilised to characterise short-term air pollution exposure in reproductive epidemiology studies and represent an exciting area for future research.

Indexed as

AdultAir PollutionAir Pollution, IndoorEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental MonitoringEpidemiologic StudiesFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansMaleMobile ApplicationsOvulation InductionParticulate MatterSemen AnalysisSmartphoneYoung AdultParticulate Matterair pollutionindoor monitorspersonal monitorsreproductive epidemiologystudy design

Identifiers

PMID31600011
PMCPMC7145751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.