ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2019
Estimating the Impact of Novel Digital Therapeutics in Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertension: Health Economic Analysis.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Economic Evaluation Associated With Clinical-Grade Mobile App-Based Digital Therapeutic Interventions: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of digital therapeutics-based cardiac rehabilitation in heart failure patients: a systematic review.ESC heart failure · 2022Pooled it
- The Willingness to Pay for Telemedicine Among Patients With Chronic Diseases: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Pooled it
- The cost-effectiveness of digital health interventions: A systematic review of the literature.Frontiers in public health · 2022Pooled it
- The Economic Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Pooled it
- Large Language Model-Based Simplification of Digital Therapeutics Explanations for Insomnia and Nicotine Dependence: Two Randomized Online Experiments.JMIR human factors · 2026Trial
- Cost-Utility Analysis and Value-Based Pricing of Digital Therapeutics for Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Chronic Respiratory Disease: Economic Evaluation Based on a Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Trial
- Evaluating the Efficacy of a Digital Therapeutic Intervention for Temporomandibular Disorders: Multicenter, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Trial
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Prescription Digital Therapeutic in Type 2 Diabetes.Advances in therapy · 2024Trial
- Exploring provider attitudes towards digital therapeutics for diabetes and depression.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Validation of a novel patient-reported measure of the burden of digital care in diabetes.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- GAIT-CKD (Gait Analysis using Artificial Intelligence for digital Therapeutics of patients with Chronic Kidney Disease): design and methods.Kidney research and clinical practice · 2025Article
- Digital Medicine Tools and the Work of Being a Patient: A Qualitative Investigation of Digital Treatment Burden in Patients With Diabetes.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2025Article
- Economic Evaluations of mHealth Interventions for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes: A Scoping Review.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025Article
- Continuous glucose monitoring for the routine care of type 2 diabetes mellitus.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2024Review
- Adoption of Digital Therapeutics in Europe.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2024Review
- Towards Ideal Health Ecosystem With Artificial Intelligence-Driven Medical Services in India: An Overview.Cureus · 2023Review
- Digital therapeutics in the clinic.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023Review
- Personalized glycemic response led digital therapeutics program improves time in range in a period of 14 days.International journal of diabetes in developing countries · 2023Article
- Cost-effectiveness of Digital Tools for Behavior Change Interventions Among People With Chronic Diseases: Systematic Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBehavioral interventions can meaningfully improve cardiometabolic conditions. Digital therapeutics (DTxs) delivering these interventions may provide benefits comparable to pharmacologic therapies, displacing medications for some patients.
objectiveOur objective was to estimate the economic impact of a digital behavioral intervention in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension (HTN) and estimate the impact of clinical inertia on deprescribing medications.
methodsDecision analytic models estimated health resource savings and cost effectiveness from a US commercial payer perspective. A 3-year time horizon was most relevant to the intervention and payer. Effectiveness of the DTx in improving clinical outcomes was based on cohort studies and published literature. Health resource utilization (HRU), health state utilities, and costs were drawn from the literature with costs adjusted to 2018 dollars. Future costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were discounted at 3%. Sensitivity analyses assessed uncertainty.
resultsAverage HRU savings ranged from $97 to $145 per patient per month, with higher potential benefits in T2DM. Cost-effectiveness acceptability analyses using a willingness-to-pay of $50,000/QALY indicated that the intervention would be cost effective at total 3-year program costs of $6468 and $6620 for T2DM and HTN, respectively. Sensitivity analyses showed that reduced medication costs are a primary driver of potential HRU savings, and the results were robust within values tested. A resistance to deprescribe medications when a patient's clinical outcomes improve can substantially reduce the estimated economic benefits. Our models rely on estimates of clinical effectiveness drawn from limited cohort studies with DTxs and cannot account for other disease management programs that may be implemented. Performance of DTxs in real-world settings is required to further validate their economic benefits.
conclusionsThe DTxs studied may provide substantial cost savings, in part by reducing the use of conventional medications. Clinical inertia may limit the full cost savings of DTxs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.