Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31599471›Full record

ArticleCancer science2019

Serum microRNA profile enables preoperative diagnosis of uterine leiomyosarcoma.

Akira Yokoi, Juntaro Matsuzaki, Yusuke Yamamoto, Keisei Tate, Yutaka Yoneoka, Hanako Shimizu, Takashi Uehara, Mitsuya Ishikawa, Satoko Takizawa, Yoshiaki Aoki and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Molecular Insights in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Frontiers in genetics · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Akira YokoiDivision of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Juntaro MatsuzakiDivision of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Yusuke YamamotoDivision of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Keisei TateDepartment of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yutaka YoneokaDepartment of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hanako ShimizuDepartment of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi UeharaDepartment of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Mitsuya IshikawaDepartment of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoko TakizawaToray Industries, Kamakura, Japan.
Yoshiaki AokiDynacom Co., Ltd., Chiba, Japan.
Ken KatoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomoyasu KatoDepartment of Gynecology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiro OchiyaDivision of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0776-9918
Tokyo National Hospital · JPNagoya University · JPNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPTokyo Medical University · JPToray Industries, Inc. (Japan) · JP

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development 18ae0101011h0005National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund 29-A-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULMS) is the major subtype of uterine sarcoma (US) and contributes to uterine cancer deaths. Although preoperative diagnosis of US remains challenging, frequent application of laparoscopic surgery for benign uterine leiomyomas (ULM) requires precise exclusion of US. MicroRNAs are stably present in the bloodstream, and the application of circulating miRNAs as disease biomarkers has been recognized. In the present study, we aimed to identify diagnostic biomarkers for distinguishing US from ULM by focusing on circulating miRNAs. All serum samples were collected preoperatively between 2009 and 2017, and all cases were histopathologically diagnosed. Whole miRNA profiles were obtained using a miRNA microarray. By analyzing expression levels of the miRNAs, candidate miRNAs were selected based on diagnostic performance in discriminating US from ULM, and a diagnostic model was then constructed. A total of 90 serum samples were analyzed, and clustering analyses revealed that the profiles of ULMS were distinct from those of controls. Based on leave-one-out cross-validation, seven miRNAs were selected as biomarker candidates. Based on model construction, the optimal model consisted of two miRNAs (miR-1246 and miR-191-5p), with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for identifying ULMS of 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-1.00). In contrast, serum lactate dehydrogenase had an AUC of only 0.64 (95% CI, 0.34-0.94). Seven serum miRNAs with high diagnostic performance for preoperative US screening were detected, and a promising diagnostic model for ULMS was generated.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCirculating MicroRNACluster AnalysisFemaleHumansLeiomyosarcomaUterine NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCirculating MicroRNAcirculating microRNAdiagnostic biomarkersliquid biopsyuterine leiomyosarcomauterine sarcoma

Identifiers

PMID31599471
PMCPMC6890430
OpenAlexW2979842474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.