Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31599359›Full record

ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2019

Legacy Effect in the Treatment of Hypertension: Persistent Cardiovascular Protection after Conclusion of Randomized Clinical Trials in Hypertension.

Giovanna Gallo, Allegra Battistoni, Roberta Coluccia, Giuliano Tocci, Massimo Volpe

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hypertension reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giovanna GalloHypertension Unit, Division of Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Allegra BattistoniHypertension Unit, Division of Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Roberta ColucciaIRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS, Italy.
Giuliano TocciHypertension Unit, Division of Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Massimo VolpeHypertension Unit, Division of Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy. massimo.volpe@uniroma1.it.
Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RECENT

findingsEssential hypertension is the main determinant of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide. During the last decades, several antihypertensive drug therapies have been introduced and tested in clinical trials, both as monotherapies and combination therapies. The current recommended therapeutic approaches effectively reduce the lifetime risk of experiencing major cardiovascular outcomes and disabling comorbidities, such as myocardial infarction, stroke, and congestive heart failure. On the basis of multiple proofs, antihypertensive therapy is currently recommended for improving event-free survival rate and quality of life in different clinical settings and conditions. At the same time, other cardiovascular drugs, including novel lipid-lowering, anti-platelet, and anti-coagulation agents, have been made available and also contribute to reduce the incidence of atherothrombotic diseases. PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Beyond the beneficial aspects obtained by pharmacological treatment of major cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities, including hypertension, several aspects remain to be defined. One major limitation linked to randomized, controlled clinical trials is represented by the relatively short duration of the studies, which usually ranges between 1 and 5 years. Whether antihypertensive therapy should be maintained for a longer time (after 5 years) and whether this is supported by sufficient evidence of a persisting benefit is supported by limited post-trial observations but mostly by findings derived from large clinical registries. The so-called legacy effect in the treatment of hypertension, in which patients who are treated with a given antihypertensive therapy may derive a long-term benefit after discontinuation of therapy, has been recently proposed on the basis of accumulating evidence and, in particular, on the availability of long-term post-trial observations in randomized controlled clinical trials. In this review, we discuss the evidence witnessing a legacy effect of antihypertensive therapy and whether this supports sufficiently lifetime drug treatment of hypertension.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsCardiovascular DiseasesHumansHypertensionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsTime FactorsAntihypertensive AgentsCardiovascular preventionHypertensionLegacy effectMyocardial infarctionRandomized clinical trialsStroke

Identifiers

PMID31599359
OpenAlexW2979781492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.