Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31599327›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging2020

Regional myocardial work by cardiac magnetic resonance and non-invasive left ventricular pressure: a feasibility study in left bundle branch block.

Camilla Kjellstad Larsen, John M Aalen, Caroline Stokke, Jan Gunnar Fjeld, Erik Kongsgaard, Jürgen Duchenne, Ganna Degtiarova, Olivier Gheysens, Jens-Uwe Voigt, Otto A Smiseth and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ventricular preexcitation-induced subclinical LV dysfunction: Insights from pressure-strain loop imaging.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. 3D regional evaluation of right ventricular myocardial work from cineCT.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Presence of contractile impairment appears crucial for structural remodeling in idiopathic left bundle-branch block.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Efficiency is key.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Camilla Kjellstad LarsenInstitute for Surgical Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
John M AalenInstitute for Surgical Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Caroline StokkeDepartment of Diagnostic Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Jan Gunnar FjeldDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, N-0027 Oslo, Norway.
Erik KongsgaardCenter for Cardiological Innovation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Jürgen DuchenneDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Ganna DegtiarovaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Olivier GheysensDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jens-Uwe VoigtDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Otto A SmisethInstitute for Surgical Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Einar HoppCenter for Cardiological Innovation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsRegional myocardial work may be assessed by pressure-strain analysis using a non-invasive estimate of left ventricular pressure (LVP). Strain by speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) is not always accessible due to poor image quality. This study investigated the estimation of regional myocardial work from strain by feature tracking (FT) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and non-invasive LVP. METHODS AND

resultsThirty-seven heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction, left bundle branch block (LBBB), and no myocardial scar were compared to nine controls without LBBB. Circumferential strain was measured by FT-CMR in a mid-ventricular short-axis cine view, and longitudinal strain by STE. Segmental work was calculated by pressure-strain analysis. Twenty-five patients underwent 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography. Segmental values were reported as percentages of the segment with maximum myocardial FDG uptake. In LBBB patients, net CMR-derived work was 51 ± 537 (mean ± standard deviation) in septum vs. 1978 ± 1084 mmHg·% in the left ventricular (LV) lateral wall (P < 0.001). In controls, however, there was homogeneous work distribution with similar values in septum and the LV lateral wall (non-significant). Reproducibility was good. Segmental CMR-derived work correlated with segmental STE-derived work and with segmental FDG uptake (average r = 0.71 and 0.80, respectively).

conclusionFT-CMR in combination with non-invasive LVP demonstrated markedly reduced work in septum compared to the LV lateral wall in patients with LBBB. Work distribution correlated with STE-derived work and energy demand as reflected in FDG uptake. These results suggest that FT-CMR in combination with non-invasive LVP is a relevant clinical tool to measure regional myocardial work.

Indexed as

Bundle-Branch BlockVentricular Function, LeftFeasibility StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMyocardial ContractionReproducibility of ResultsVentricular Pressure18F-fluorodeoxy glucosecardiac magnetic resonancedyssynchronyfeature trackingheart failuremyocardial workpositron emission tomographystrain

Identifiers

PMID31599327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.