Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31598965›Full record

Observational studyHealth services research2019

Impact of family practice continuity of care on unplanned hospital use for people with serious mental illness.

Jemimah Ride, Panagiotis Kasteridis, Nils Gutacker, Tim Doran, Nigel Rice, Hugh Gravelle, Tony Kendrick, Anne Mason, Maria Goddard, Najma Siddiqi and 5 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Jess's Rule: advocating for continuity, ownership, and generalism in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Jemimah RideHealth Economics Unit, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1820-5499
Panagiotis KasteridisCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.
Nils GutackerCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.
Tim DoranDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Nigel RiceCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.
Hugh GravelleCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.
Tony KendrickDepartment of Primary Care, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Anne MasonCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5823-3064
Maria GoddardCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.
Najma SiddiqiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Simon GilbodyMental Health and Addiction Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Rachael WilliamsClinical Practice Research Datalink, London, UK.
Lauren AylottHealth Professions Education Unit, Hull York Medical School, York, UK.
Ceri DareService User, York, North Yorkshire, UK.
Rowena JacobsCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.

Funding

Department of Health 15/70/26Department of Health HS&DR/13/54/40National Institute for Health Services & Delivery Research Program 135440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate whether continuity of care in family practice reduces unplanned hospital use for people with serious mental illness (SMI). DATA SOURCES: Linked administrative data on family practice and hospital utilization by people with SMI in England, 2007-2014. STUDY

designThis observational cohort study used discrete-time survival analysis to investigate the relationship between continuity of care in family practice and unplanned hospital use: emergency department (ED) presentations, and unplanned admissions for SMI and ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSC). The analysis distinguishes between relational continuity and management/ informational continuity (as captured by care plans) and accounts for unobserved confounding by examining deviation from long-term averages. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION

methodsIndividual-level family practice administrative data linked to hospital administrative data. PRINCIPAL

findingsHigher relational continuity was associated with 8-11 percent lower risk of ED presentation and 23-27 percent lower risk of ACSC admissions. Care plans were associated with 29 percent lower risk of ED presentation, 39 percent lower risk of SMI admissions, and 32 percent lower risk of ACSC admissions.

conclusionsFamily practice continuity of care can reduce unplanned hospital use for physical and mental health of people with SMI.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesContinuity of Patient CareEnglandFamily PracticeFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareYoung Adultcontinuity of carefamily practicehospital careserious mental illness

Identifiers

PMID31598965
PMCPMC6863233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.