Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31598799›Full record

ReviewMagma (New York, N.Y.)2020

Image registration in dynamic renal MRI-current status and prospects.

Frank G Zöllner, Amira Šerifović-Trbalić, Gordian Kabelitz, Marek Kociński, Andrzej Materka, Peter Rogelj

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Generation of annotated multimodal ground truth datasets for abdominal medical image registration.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Frank G ZöllnerComputer Assisted Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany. frank.zoellner@medma.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3405-1394
Amira Šerifović-TrbalićFaculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Gordian KabelitzComputer Assisted Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Marek KocińskiInstitute of Electronics, Lodz University of Technology, Lodz, Poland.
Andrzej MaterkaInstitute of Electronics, Lodz University of Technology, Lodz, Poland.
Peter RogeljFaculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Information Technologies, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung Forschungscampus: public-private partnership for Innovations, funding code 13GW0092DBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung Forschungscampus: public-private partnership for Innovations, funding code 13GW0388AEuropean Cooperation in Science and Technology CA16103 - Magnetic Resonance Imaging Biomarkers for Chronic Kidney DiseaseH2020 Spreading Excellence and Widening Participation InnoRenew CoE project, #739574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) modalities have achieved an increasingly important role in the clinical work-up of chronic kidney diseases (CKD). This comprises among others assessment of hemodynamic parameters by arterial spin labeling (ASL) or dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE-) MRI. Especially in the latter, images or volumes of the kidney are acquired over time for up to several minutes. Therefore, they are hampered by motion, e.g., by pulsation, peristaltic, or breathing motion. This motion can hinder subsequent image analysis to estimate hemodynamic parameters like renal blood flow or glomerular filtration rate (GFR). To overcome motion artifacts in time-resolved renal MRI, a wide range of strategies have been proposed. Renal image registration approaches could be grouped into (1) image acquisition techniques, (2) post-processing methods, or (3) a combination of image acquisition and post-processing approaches. Despite decades of progress, the translation in clinical practice is still missing. The aim of the present article is to discuss the existing literature on renal image registration techniques and show today's limitations of the proposed techniques that hinder clinical translation. This paper includes transformation, criterion function, and search types as traditional components and emerging registration technologies based on deep learning. The current trend points towards faster registrations and more accurate results. However, a standardized evaluation of image registration in renal MRI is still missing.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsArteriesArtifactsContrast MediaDeep LearningGlomerular Filtration RateHemodynamicsHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedKidneyKidney Failure, ChronicMotionRenal CirculationReproducibility of ResultsContrast MediaSpin LabelsASLDCE-MRIDynamic MRIImage registrationKidney disease

Identifiers

PMID31598799
PMCPMC7210245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.