ArticleHNO2020
[The Freiburg monosyllabic speech test in noise].
Article in HNO, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [In adaptive measurement: Shortened Freiburg monosyllabic test vs. Oldenburg sentence test in noise].Laryngo- rhino- otologie · 2025Article
- [Correlation between the APHAB questionnaire and the Freiburg monosyllabic test without + with noise].Laryngo- rhino- otologie · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSince 2017, the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test can be used in hearing aid evaluation with background noise in Germany. The results are used to compare the aided versus the unaided condition. However, there is currently no reference speech recognition curve for a comparison to listeners with normal hearing.
objectiveThe goal is to establish a reference speech recognition curve for listeners with normal hearing and to analyze the perceptual equivalence of the test lists in continuous CCITT noise (according to Comité Consultatif International Téléphonique et Télégraphique). MATERIALS AND
methodsThe measurements were conducted at two different sites with 90 participants in total. Monosyllables and CCITT noise were presented at different signal-to-noise ratios by one loudspeaker from the front (S
resultsThe reference speech recognition curve and its region of tolerance were established. Three perceptively deviating test lists (1, 3, 20) were identified.
conclusionThe reference speech recognition curve enables quantification of hearing difficulties with Freiburg monosyllables in noise and an estimation of the rehabilitation with hearing aids. This reference curve is only valid for frontal stimulus presentation (S
Indexed as
Identifiers
31598771What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.